Educational consultancy & UK student visa service website for SAJ Consultants / SAJ World

A groundbreaking study in fiduciary-epistemic theory that reimagines the modern university as a constitutional guardian of knowledge. It exposes how marketisation and managerialism erode truth, compares universities to hybrid AI firms, and proposes legal reform to restore candour, accountability, and public trust in knowledge.

Legal advocacy and research by Peter Kahl exposing systemic opacity and fiduciary breaches in UK higher education, with formal action against key governance bodies.

Detailed press release on legal warnings issued to UK Education Select Committee, demanding transparency, conflict-of-interest disclosures, and accountability amid higher education governance crisis.

Peter Kahl’s essay critically examines systemic governance failures in UK higher education, including fiduciary opacity, epistemic clientelism, lobbying by charities, and administrative entrenchment. It proposes nationalisation with comprehensive fiduciary-epistemic reforms to restore accountability and justice.

Report on Times Higher Education by Peter Kahl (Lex et Ratio Ltd, 2025). Examines structural conflicts of interest in THE’s rankings, journalism, and consultancy. Highlights epistemic clientelism, opaque convening, and the need for transparency, structural separation, and fiduciary openness.

An interdisciplinary study of the classic ‘falling tree’ problem, exploring epistemic trust, subjugated silence, and fiduciary authority across knowledge, culture, and power.

Comprehensive dissertation by Peter Kahl on epistemic justice in higher education. Develops a fiduciary framework for universities as stewards of the epistemic commons, integrating philosophy, law, and comparative case studies.

Evidence-based policy paper analysing governance, market, and fiscal risks in England’s higher education sector, featuring the HEPI case study and reform proposals to embed fiduciary openness and independent oversight.

This policy report argues that UK higher education should be treated as critical national infrastructure. It highlights systemic risks from market fragility, fiscal exposure, and governance opacity, and sets out reforms for fiduciary openness, resilience planning, and conflict-proofed oversight.