-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
fix(ethexe): remove validate-chain-deepness-limit; fix errors handling in aggregation #5018
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @grishasobol, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on refining the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces several significant improvements to the consensus logic. The primary change is the removal of the validate-chain-deepness-limit configuration, simplifying the validation process. Concurrently, error handling has been substantially improved, particularly in the chain commitment aggregation logic. The aggregate_chain_commitment function has been refactored into try_aggregate_chain_commitment, which now provides more robust and explicit error handling instead of returning optional values. Similarly, the logic for aggregating validator commitments has been made more resilient with better-defined state checks and error conditions. I've identified one area concerning the handling of missed validator commitments that could be made more robust to ensure chain integrity. Overall, these changes enhance the clarity, correctness, and maintainability of the codebase.
No description provided.