Skip to content

Conversation

@Licenser
Copy link
Member

@Licenser Licenser commented Oct 7, 2025

No description provided.

@Licenser Licenser merged commit c18bb92 into main Oct 7, 2025
17 of 29 checks passed
@Licenser Licenser deleted the rel0.17 branch October 7, 2025 09:28
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 7, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.07%. Comparing base (15567c3) to head (f8e5d67).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #435   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.06%   72.07%           
=======================================
  Files          51       51           
  Lines       11403    11405    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         8218     8220    +2     
  Misses       3185     3185           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 72.07% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2025

Benchmark for 5934708

Click to view benchmark
Test Base PR %
apache_builds/simd_json::to_tape_with_buffers 94.5±2.08µs 92.8±1.60µs -1.80%
canada/simd_json::to_tape_with_buffers 3.5±0.18ms 3.4±0.18ms -2.86%
citm_catalog/simd_json::to_tape_with_buffers 1079.0±78.65µs 1053.4±72.49µs -2.37%
event_stacktrace_10kb/simd_json::to_tape_with_buffers 3.8±0.22µs 3.8±0.24µs 0.00%
github_events/simd_json::to_tape_with_buffers 41.3±0.93µs 40.9±0.88µs -0.97%
log/simd_json::to_tape_with_buffers 1622.9±106.48ns 1544.9±89.43ns -4.81%
twitter/simd_json::to_tape_with_buffers 432.6±30.45µs 426.1±31.49µs -1.50%

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants