Skip to content

Conversation

@benzekrimaha
Copy link
Contributor

@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha commented Oct 24, 2025

Issue : CLDSRV-724

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Oct 24, 2025

Hello benzekrimaha,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha changed the base branch from development/9.1 to improvement/CLDSRV-724-multiple-backend-tests October 24, 2025 15:54
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Oct 24, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.35%. Comparing base (b74528b) to head (fc23278).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                              Coverage Diff                               @@
##           improvement/CLDSRV-724-multiple-backend-tests    #5987   +/-   ##
==============================================================================
  Coverage                                          84.35%   84.35%           
==============================================================================
  Files                                                204      204           
  Lines                                              12928    12928           
==============================================================================
  Hits                                               10906    10906           
  Misses                                              2022     2022           
Flag Coverage Δ
kmip-ft-tests 28.15% <ø> (ø)
multiple-backend 35.31% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests 36.43% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests-inflights 37.44% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
utapi-v2-tests 34.32% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-724-multiple-backend-tests branch 3 times, most recently from 327e859 to 58f8c81 Compare October 27, 2025 14:31
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-724-object-related-functional-tests branch 3 times, most recently from 69b2a4a to c56ac68 Compare October 27, 2025 16:32
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2025 16:33
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-724-multiple-backend-tests branch from 6d97621 to d8c1d88 Compare October 27, 2025 18:28
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-724-object-related-functional-tests branch from c56ac68 to 06547e0 Compare October 28, 2025 06:56
Comment on lines +421 to 423
// with number of parts at the end)
assert.strictEqual(res.ETag,
'"5bba96810ff449d94aa8f5c5a859b0cb-2"');
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The indent looks wrong in github diff view

it('should put an object and set the acl via query param',
done => {
async () => {
// Create a temporary file for upload
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// Create a temporary file for upload

@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-724-multiple-backend-tests branch 2 times, most recently from f0a4294 to c244695 Compare December 4, 2025 05:52
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-724-object-related-functional-tests branch from 06547e0 to 1166011 Compare December 4, 2025 06:10
Copy link
Contributor

@SylvainSenechal SylvainSenechal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Crazy pr 😅

Copy link
Contributor

@DarkIsDude DarkIsDude left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congrats again. Minor changes but we are good 👏

const testS3 = new S3Client(config);
let capturedHeaders = {};

// Add middleware to capture response headers (similar to AWS SDK v2's event approach)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

up

try {
const result = await next(args);

// Capture response headers (equivalent to request.on('success'))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure it's really useful here. You have that in mind cause you did v2 to v3, but someone new will not understand

name: middlewareName,
};

// Add middleware
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// Add middleware

@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-724-multiple-backend-tests branch from da7043b to b74528b Compare December 23, 2025 15:37
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-724-object-related-functional-tests branch from e3a5360 to fc23278 Compare December 23, 2025 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants