Skip to content

Conversation

@bnbajwa
Copy link
Contributor

@bnbajwa bnbajwa commented Nov 5, 2025

SDB-10086

@bnbajwa bnbajwa requested a review from a team as a code owner November 5, 2025 12:08
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @bnbajwa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on updating a core dependency, the Boost C++ libraries, to a more recent version. This upgrade is crucial for incorporating the latest enhancements, performance optimizations, and security updates offered by Boost 1.88, ensuring the project remains robust and leverages modern library features.

Highlights

  • Boost Library Upgrade: The project's dependency on the Boost C++ libraries has been upgraded from version 1.74 to 1.88 in the CMakeLists.txt configuration.
Ignored Files
  • Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (3)
    • .github/workflows/ci-build.yml
    • .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml
    • .github/workflows/release.yml
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request upgrades the Boost library from version 1.74 to 1.88. My review identifies a couple of opportunities to improve the CMake configuration related to this upgrade. I've suggested making the version requirement more strict to improve build reproducibility, and also pointed out an obsolete preprocessor macro that can be removed. On a general note, the pull request title mentions changes to a 'build image tag', but these changes don't appear in the provided diff. It would be helpful to either include those changes or update the title for clarity. A more descriptive pull request description would also provide better context for reviewers.

@bnbajwa bnbajwa enabled auto-merge (rebase) November 5, 2025 12:33
@bnbajwa bnbajwa merged commit 156fb61 into reactivemarkets:master Nov 5, 2025
5 checks passed
@bnbajwa bnbajwa deleted the boost branch November 5, 2025 12:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants