Lock Code Manager is a Home Assistant integration that allows you to more easily manage your usercodes on your locks. Once you have configured it, the integration will set and clear codes on your locks as needed depending on how you decide to configure them.
Features:
- Synchronize multiple locks with a single set of codes
- Optionally use a condition entity to control when a code is active. Supported entity types:
calendar- code is active when an event is in progressbinary_sensor- code is active when the sensor isonswitch- code is active when the switch isonschedule- code is active when the schedule isoninput_boolean- code is active when the input boolean ison
- Optionally define a maximum number of uses for a code before the code is disabled
Locks from the following integrations are currently supported:
- Z-Wave
- Virtual custom integration. See the Wiki page on this integration for more details on why it was built and how it works.
The code was written to make it (I think) easy to add support for locks in other integrations. Check the Wiki if you want to learn more about that and take a stab at it. Contributors welcome!
Many lock integrations don't yet have Lock Code Manager providers, but could potentially be added in the future. The integrations listed below are different - they cannot be supported due to fundamental limitations in their underlying libraries or protocols.
The Home Assistant lock platform only requires lock/unlock operations. User code management is optional, and these integrations don't expose it.
| Integration | Reason |
|---|---|
| ESPHome | The ESPHome lock component only supports lock/unlock/open commands. User code management would need to be implemented in ESPHome's firmware and API first. |
Yale/August (august, yale, yalexs_ble, yale_smart_alarm) |
The underlying libraries have limited support. The yalexs library (used by both august and yale) can read PINs via async_get_pins() but has no methods to create, update, or delete them. The yalexs-ble and yalesmartalarmclient libraries don't expose any PIN management. Support would require upstream library changes. |
If you're interested in adding support for one of these integrations, the blocker is typically the underlying Python library - not Lock Code Manager itself. Contributing user code management features to those libraries would enable LCM support.
Some integrations create switch or binary_sensor entities that appear compatible but have semantics that don't map to Lock Code Manager's access control model:
| Integration | Reason |
|---|---|
| scheduler-component | Creates switch entities for task scheduling, not time-based access. The on state means "schedule is enabled and waiting," not "access is currently allowed." Use the native Schedule helper instead. |
See the wiki for details.
The best way to install this integration is via HACS.
- Set up your locks as entities to your Home Assistant instance through the corresponding integration (e.g. Z-Wave)
- Add this repository as a custom integration repository in HACS
- Go to Settings > Devices & Services > Add Integration
- Select Lock Code Manager
- Follow the prompts - additional information about the configuration options are available in the Wiki
The Wiki is a WIP but has some content that might be helpful for you!
Lock Code Manager provides Lovelace strategies and custom cards for managing and monitoring PINs. You can use the dashboard strategy (full dashboard), the view strategy (single view for a config entry), or the custom cards directly.
See DASHBOARD_CONFIGURATION.md for detailed configuration options, or the wiki for additional guidance.
I spent some time contributing to keymaster,
and what I learned working on it, and the regular complaints users had about it generating
too many automations, entities, etc. led me to take a different approach. This isn't a
knock on keymaster, unfortunately a lot of what is built in this integration wasn't
possible for most of keymaster's life. I briefly considered implementing this into
keymaster but:
keymasteris still a great solution that works as is, and is more feature rich than this integration will likely ever be.keymasteris surprisingly simple under the hood because it makes Home Assistant do a lot of the heavy lifting for figuring out when to enable and disable a usercode. This integration, on the other hand, attempts to do all of the heavy lifting internally in code, which means it will generate less entities and automations but it is likely more fragile to changes in HA Core or even changes in the codebase.- It would be impossible to seamlessly migrate users from the current implementation of
keymasterto this integration's implementation. Rewritingkeymasterto do this would have been the equivalent of creating a new integration anyway, and since it's a separate integration, users have a choice of what implementation they want to use. Additionally, you can install the integrations side by side and slowly migrate your locks over in either direction as needed.
A big thank you to the other keymaster maintainers:
- @FutureTense
- @firstof9
As well as the person who created the base concept that keymaster evolved from:
@ptdalen