box for 5.6mm acrylic and fusion file #4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi — here is a set of dxf files (scale still 1 unit = 1mm) for "1/4 inch" (actually 0.22" / 5.6mm) acrylic. I also provide a fusion file of the design. The parameter "acr_thickness" in the "behavior_box_base" design is inherited by the rest of the designs, and changing that parameter should allow you to scale the holes / other cuts for arbitrary acrylic thicknesses.
I did change some of the other dimensions of the panels very slightly, in the course of putting the design into Fusion, and for whatever reason, when I cut it out, there was a larger gap than I expected along the vertical edges where the side and front / back panels meet. It's not terrible but it's enough to let a little light in, and I will probably put some tape over it. I think probably I failed to account for enough kerf on those panels. If I end up with a perfect design I will submit another PR but this is close enough.