Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @kooksee, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request delivers a significant maintenance and documentation update for the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request introduces several important fixes and improvements to the Redant CLI framework. Key changes include fixing critical issues related to Int64 type handling and default value application, enhancing flag inheritance logic, and improving the argument parsing mechanism. A significant addition is the comprehensive suite of unit tests for both command execution and flag value types, which greatly improves the robustness and reliability of the framework. The README.md and CHANGELOG.md have been updated to reflect these changes, and a detailed EVALUATION.md report has been added, providing excellent documentation and a clear roadmap for future development.
| func (i Int64) String() string { | ||
| return strconv.Itoa(int(i)) | ||
| return strconv.FormatInt(int64(i), 10) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| func (Int64) Type() string { | ||
| return "int" | ||
| return "int64" |
| // Apply default value to the Value before adding the flag | ||
| if opt.Default != "" && val != DiscardValue { | ||
| _ = val.Set(opt.Default) // Ignore error, will be caught during validation | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| import ( | ||
| "context" | ||
| "fmt" | ||
| "os" | ||
| "strings" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| if err := rootCmd.Invoke().WithOS().Run(); err != nil { | ||
| panic(err) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For consistency with the Command with Options example, it is recommended to use fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, err); os.Exit(1) instead of panic(err) for error handling in user-facing examples. This provides a more graceful exit for CLI applications.
| if err := rootCmd.Invoke().WithOS().Run(); err != nil { | |
| panic(err) | |
| } | |
| if err := rootCmd.Invoke().WithOS().Run(); err != nil { | |
| fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, err) | |
| os.Exit(1) | |
| } |
| // Add flags from all parent commands to support flag inheritance | ||
| // This allows child commands to use flags defined in parent commands | ||
| for p := inv.Command.parent; p != nil; p = p.parent { | ||
| p.Options.FlagSet(p.Name()).VisitAll(func(f *pflag.Flag) { | ||
| if inv.Flags.Lookup(f.Name) == nil { | ||
| inv.Flags.AddFlag(f) | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The comment for flag inheritance mentions adding flags from parent commands. While the code correctly adds flags, it might be more robust to also consider if a child command explicitly redefines a flag from a parent. In such cases, the child's definition should take precedence. The current logic adds the parent's flag only if it doesn't already exist in inv.Flags, which is good, but it might be worth adding a note about how conflicts are resolved if a child command defines a flag with the same name as a parent's flag.
No description provided.