Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR updates dix to v2, introducing a new dixrender package for graph generation, dixhttp package for HTTP-based dependency visualization, and dixcontext for context integration. Refactors internal error handling with slog logging, moves public Graph APIs to dixrender, and updates all example code and documentation to reflect v2 module paths. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Browser Client
participant HTTPServer as dixhttp Server
participant Handler as HTTP Handler
participant Dix as Dix Container
participant Adapter as DixAdapter
participant Renderer as dixrender
Client->>HTTPServer: GET /api/dependencies
HTTPServer->>Handler: HandleDependencies(w, r)
Handler->>Handler: extractDependencyData()
Handler->>Dix: GetProviders()
Dix-->>Handler: map[Type][]ProviderFn
Handler->>Dix: GetObjects()
Dix-->>Handler: map[Type]map[Group][]Value
Handler->>Handler: Build ProviderInfo, ObjectInfo, EdgeInfo
Handler->>Client: JSON Response (providers, objects, edges)
Client->>HTTPServer: GET /api/graph?type=providers
HTTPServer->>Handler: Generate graph request
Handler->>Adapter: NewDixAdapter(dix)
Adapter-->>Handler: DixAccessor interface
Handler->>Renderer: GenerateProviderGraph(adapter, opts)
Renderer->>Adapter: GetProviders()
Adapter-->>Renderer: Wrapped providers via reflection
Renderer->>Adapter: GetFnName(), GetInputTypes()
Renderer-->>Handler: DOT string
Handler->>Client: Graph visualization (HTML with DOT rendering)
Estimated code review effort🎯 5 (Critical) | ⏱️ ~120 minutes The changes span 50+ files with intricate, multi-pattern transformations: new dixrender and dixhttp packages introduce complex graph generation and HTTP visualization logic; core dixinternal refactoring overhauls error handling, logging, and provider execution; significant public API restructuring (Graph relocation, new introspection methods); heterogeneous changes across documentation, examples, and dependencies; large test suite covering multiple injection patterns and edge cases. Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @kooksee, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a significant refactoring and enhancement of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
kooksee
force-pushed
the
feat/render1
branch
from
04d9fa1 to
b8b1bcf
Compare
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly enhances the dependency visualization tool by adding search, filtering, and improved node label formatting. The refactoring of the JavaScript code is a great step towards better maintainability. My review focuses on the new client-side logic, where I've identified a few critical issues in the label formatting functions that could display incorrect information, and I've also suggested some performance improvements for deep cloning objects.
| for (let i = packageParts.length - partsToTry; i < packageParts.length; i++) { | ||
| if (i < 0) continue; | ||
| const part = packageParts[i]; | ||
| const candidate = part + '.' + result; | ||
|
|
||
| if (candidate.length <= maxLength) { | ||
| result = candidate; | ||
| } else { | ||
| // 如果加上当前包名部分超过限制，添加省略号并返回 | ||
| return '...' + result; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The loop for prepending package parts to the type name is incorrect. It iterates from the middle of the package path instead of from the end. This results in incorrectly formatted labels, for example a.b.c.MyType could be shortened to c.b.MyType instead of the expected b.c.MyType.
| for (let i = packageParts.length - partsToTry; i < packageParts.length; i++) { | |
| if (i < 0) continue; | |
| const part = packageParts[i]; | |
| const candidate = part + '.' + result; | |
| if (candidate.length <= maxLength) { | |
| result = candidate; | |
| } else { | |
| // 如果加上当前包名部分超过限制，添加省略号并返回 | |
| return '...' + result; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| for (let i = 1; i <= partsToTry; i++) { | |
| const partIndex = packageParts.length - i; | |
| if (partIndex < 0) continue; | |
| const part = packageParts[partIndex]; | |
| const candidate = part + '.' + result; | |
| if (candidate.length <= maxLength) { | |
| result = candidate; | |
| } else { | |
| // 如果加上当前包名部分超过限制，添加省略号并返回 | |
| return '...' + result; | |
| } | |
| } |
| const parts = functionName.split('.'); | ||
| const packageParts = parts.length > 0 ? parts : []; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for splitting the function name into package parts is incorrect. It includes the function name itself in packageParts, and it doesn't handle trailing dots in the functionName which can occur for methods. This leads to incorrect label generation.
| const parts = functionName.split('.'); | |
| const packageParts = parts.length > 0 ? parts : []; | |
| const parts = functionName.replace(/\.$/, '').split('.'); | |
| const packageParts = parts.length > 1 ? parts.slice(0, -1) : []; |
| for (let i = packageParts.length - partsToTry; i < packageParts.length; i++) { | ||
| if (i < 0) continue; | ||
| const part = packageParts[i]; | ||
| const candidate = part + '.' + result; | ||
|
|
||
| if (candidate.length <= maxLength) { | ||
| result = candidate; | ||
| } else { | ||
| // 如果加上当前包名部分超过限制，添加省略号并返回 | ||
| return '...' + result; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The loop for prepending package parts to the function name is incorrect. It iterates from the middle of the package path instead of from the end, which will result in incorrectly formatted labels.
| for (let i = packageParts.length - partsToTry; i < packageParts.length; i++) { | |
| if (i < 0) continue; | |
| const part = packageParts[i]; | |
| const candidate = part + '.' + result; | |
| if (candidate.length <= maxLength) { | |
| result = candidate; | |
| } else { | |
| // 如果加上当前包名部分超过限制，添加省略号并返回 | |
| return '...' + result; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| for (let i = 1; i <= partsToTry; i++) { | |
| const partIndex = packageParts.length - i; | |
| if (partIndex < 0) continue; | |
| const part = packageParts[partIndex]; | |
| const candidate = part + '.' + result; | |
| if (candidate.length <= maxLength) { | |
| result = candidate; | |
| } else { | |
| // 如果加上当前包名部分超过限制，添加省略号并返回 | |
| return '...' + result; | |
| } | |
| } |
| allNodes = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(nodes)); | ||
| allEdges = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(edges)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(...)) for deep cloning can be inefficient for large graphs and has limitations (e.g., it doesn't handle all data types correctly). The modern structuredClone() function is more performant and robust for this task.
| allNodes = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(nodes)); | |
| allEdges = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(edges)); | |
| allNodes = structuredClone(nodes); | |
| allEdges = structuredClone(edges); |
| if (network) { | ||
| // 创建节点副本以避免修改原始数据 | ||
| const nodesToDisplay = filteredNodes.map(node => { | ||
| const nodeCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(node)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(...)) for deep cloning inside a loop can be inefficient, especially for larger graphs. The modern structuredClone() function is more performant and robust for this task.
| const nodeCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(node)); | |
| const nodeCopy = structuredClone(node); |
kooksee
force-pushed
the
feat/render1
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a62c75d to
1dba8a8
Compare
kooksee
force-pushed
the
feat/render1
branch
from
1dba8a8 to
3706e96
Compare
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Improvements
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.