ignore claim selector error in ci #2050
Conversation
WalkthroughAdded a new ignore pattern "claim Selector is not supported" to the errorIgnorePatterns list in the flake detection logic. This expands the set of error messages excluded during flaky test log analysis without modifying core detection logic. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: weshayutin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
| "level=error msg=\"error patch for managed fields ", | ||
| "VolumeSnapshot has a temporary error Failed to create snapshot: error updating status for volume snapshot content snapcontent-", | ||
| "Skipping hypershift plugin execution - not a hypershift backup: error checking for HostedControlPlane CRD", | ||
| "claim Selector is not supported", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this error present in Velero logs ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Claude is reviewing that file for things to ignore :) I'll double check where the error actually lives.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/e2e/lib/flakes.go(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
-Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity.
Files:
tests/e2e/lib/flakes.go
| "level=error msg=\"error patch for managed fields ", | ||
| "VolumeSnapshot has a temporary error Failed to create snapshot: error updating status for volume snapshot content snapcontent-", | ||
| "Skipping hypershift plugin execution - not a hypershift backup: error checking for HostedControlPlane CRD", | ||
| "claim Selector is not supported", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# Examine the file structure and context around line 25
cd /
find . -name "flakes.go" -type f 2>/dev/null | head -5Repository: openshift/oadp-operator
Length of output: 110
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the file to see the context around line 25
cat -n ./home/jailuser/git/tests/e2e/lib/flakes.go | head -40Repository: openshift/oadp-operator
Length of output: 142
🏁 Script executed:
# Find the file from repository root
find . -name "flakes.go" -type f 2>/dev/nullRepository: openshift/oadp-operator
Length of output: 92
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the file to see context around line 25
cat -n ./tests/e2e/lib/flakes.go | head -50Repository: openshift/oadp-operator
Length of output: 2551
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for "claim Selector" in the codebase to understand context and specificity
rg -i "claim.?selector" --type go --type yaml -A 2 -B 2Repository: openshift/oadp-operator
Length of output: 466
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for "Selector" in the codebase to understand the source of this error
rg -i "selector" --type go -A 2 -B 2 | head -100Repository: openshift/oadp-operator
Length of output: 7070
Add documentation for the ignore pattern.
This pattern lacks the explanatory comment that other patterns in this list have (compare to lines 20-24). Add a comment explaining why this error is ignored and what component it relates to. Additionally, verify that the pattern is specific enough to match only the intended errors, as the generic phrasing could potentially match errors from other sources.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In tests/e2e/lib/flakes.go around line 25, the ignore pattern "claim Selector is
not supported" lacks the explanatory comment other entries have; add a concise
comment above this line stating why this error is ignored (e.g., caused by
specific component X or known upstream behavior in component Y), what test or
subsystem emits it, and the rationale for ignoring it; also tighten the pattern
if necessary (make it more specific or include surrounding context/field names)
so it only matches the intended component's error and not unrelated errors.
|
/retest |
|
@weshayutin: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/test 4.20-e2e-test-aws |
3 participants
Why the changes were made
so claude ignores this error about gp3-csi
How to test the changes made
ci run