Skip to content

MTA-5290 First commit of Rules Development Modularization Work #280

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
Pkylas007 wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

MTA-5290 First commit of Rules Development Modularization Work #280

Pkylas007 wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@Pkylas007
Copy link
Collaborator

@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 commented Dec 15, 2025

JIRA

Version

  • 8.0.0

Preview

What changed

  • Changed the user guide title to Configuring and using rules for MTA analysis.
  • Introducing assemblies for all sections and introductions in assemblies.
  • Introduced new modules for nested conditions, custom Go rule, custom Python rule, and custom Node.js rule.
  • Rewrote the introduction in some of the assemblies and provided internal links to target modules.
  • Provided examples for Java locations and provider capability fields.

MTA-5290 First commit of Rules Development Modularization Work
9d3e214 
Signed-off-by: Prabha Kylasamiyer Sundara Rajan <pkylasam@pkylasam-thinkpadp16vgen1.bengluru.csb>
@Pkylas007 Pkylas007 force-pushed the mta-5290-rules-modularization branch from d1b70a7 to 9d3e214 Compare December 15, 2025 10:52
Fixed the build error at last
2932b0f 
Signed-off-by: Prabha Kylasamiyer Sundara Rajan <pkylasam@pkylasam-thinkpadp16vgen1.bengluru.csb>
ibragins
ibragins approved these changes Dec 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@ibragins ibragins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jmle jmle Awaiting requested review from jmle

@eemcmullan eemcmullan Awaiting requested review from eemcmullan

1 more reviewer

@ibragins ibragins ibragins approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Pkylas007 @ibragins