Skip to content

Conversation

@tractorss
Copy link
Contributor

@tractorss tractorss commented Dec 18, 2025

PR-Codex overview

This PR simplifies the logic in the WithdrawAppealFees.tsx file by removing a nested loop, which iterated over round. Now, it directly pushes a single set of arguments for each contribution, streamlining the argument preparation for setContractConfigs.

Detailed summary

  • Removed the nested loop that iterated over round.
  • Updated the argsArr.push to only include contribution.choice without the round parameter.
  • Simplified the argument preparation for setContractConfigs.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Refactor
    • Streamlined appeal fee withdrawal transactions for faster processing and improved efficiency

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@tractorss tractorss requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2025 12:18
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools failed. Why did it fail? →

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit dba605c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kleros-v2-testnet-devtools/deploys/69447347d8e6ec000808e699

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Walkthrough

The WithdrawAppealFees component's transaction batch generation logic was simplified. Previously, the code emitted multiple transaction calls per contribution—one for each round iteration from roundIndex down to 0. Now it emits a single call per contribution, with transaction arguments reduced to id, contributor.id, and contribution.choice.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
WithdrawAppealFees logic simplification
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/MaintenanceButtons/WithdrawAppealFees.tsx
Removed per-round argument generation; transaction batch now emits single call per contribution instead of multiple calls across rounds. Updated withdrawFeesAndRewards args to drop round parameter.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Single file modification with localized logic changes
  • Verify batching logic correctly consolidates contributions into single calls
  • Confirm transaction argument structure matches expected withdrawFeesAndRewards signature

Poem

A rabbit hops through code so bright,
Round loops removed—what a delight!
One call per gift, no rounds to chase,
Simplicity blooms in this tranquil space. 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title is vague and lacks specificity about the actual changes made. While it mentions 'withdraw-appeal-fees-maintainance-button', the summary shows the key change is removing per-round argument generation and simplifying transaction batching logic—details that are not captured in the title. Consider a more descriptive title like 'fix: simplify withdraw appeal fees batching logic by removing per-round calls' to better convey the primary architectural change.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/update-withdraw-fees-maintainance-button

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo failed. Why did it fail? →

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit dba605c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kleros-v2-neo/deploys/694473476469f00008a36716

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit dba605c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kleros-v2-testnet/deploys/69447347d861cb0008353df3
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2206--kleros-v2-testnet.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/MaintenanceButtons/WithdrawAppealFees.tsx (2)

76-76: Remove unused roundIndex from dependencies.

The roundIndex is included in the useEffect dependencies but is no longer used within the effect body after the logic simplification. This causes unnecessary re-execution of the effect when roundIndex changes.

🔎 Apply this diff to remove the unused dependency:
-  }, [id, roundIndex, chainId, filteredContributions]);
+  }, [id, chainId, filteredContributions]);

26-32: Remove roundIndex prop or clarify its purpose.

The roundIndex parameter is passed from the parent component but is never used in transaction generation logic. It only serves as an undefined guard check at line 58. Either remove it entirely (updating both the interface and parent component usage), or document why the guard is necessary if it serves a specific purpose.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4cdb9f9 and 9f72187.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/MaintenanceButtons/WithdrawAppealFees.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich
Repo: kleros/kleros-v2 PR: 1775
File: web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T12:36:59.441Z
Learning: In the `StakeWithdrawButton` component, the transaction flow logic is tightly linked to component updates, so extracting it into a custom hook does not provide significant benefits.
📚 Learning: 2024-12-09T12:36:59.441Z
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich
Repo: kleros/kleros-v2 PR: 1775
File: web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T12:36:59.441Z
Learning: In the `StakeWithdrawButton` component, the transaction flow logic is tightly linked to component updates, so extracting it into a custom hook does not provide significant benefits.

Applied to files:

  • web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/MaintenanceButtons/WithdrawAppealFees.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (14)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - kleros-v2-testnet
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - kleros-v2-testnet
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - kleros-v2-testnet
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - kleros-v2-testnet
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - kleros-v2-testnet
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - kleros-v2-testnet
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - kleros-v2-neo
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - kleros-v2-neo
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - kleros-v2-neo
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - kleros-v2-testnet-devtools
  • GitHub Check: hardhat-tests
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - kleros-v2-testnet-devtools
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - kleros-v2-testnet-devtools
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/MaintenanceButtons/WithdrawAppealFees.tsx (1)

69-72: No review comment was provided for rewriting. Please provide the review comment you would like me to verify and rewrite.

@tractorss tractorss enabled auto-merge December 18, 2025 13:09
@kemuru kemuru self-requested a review December 18, 2025 13:35
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@tractorss tractorss merged commit 89766af into dev Dec 18, 2025
10 of 20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants