WIP: Switching to using Bagbutik #254
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Prior to this commit the project used AppStoreConnect_Swift_SDK for all API interactions. This commit starts refactoring the project to use Bagbutik instead. Bagbutik supports Linux and provides a better (async/await) based API and is generated from the AppStoreConnect Swagger spec.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prior to this PR the project used
AppStoreConnect_Swift_SDKfor all API interactions.This PR refactors the project to use
Bagbutikinstead.Bagbutiksupports Linux and provides a better (async/await) based API and is generated from the AppStoreConnect Swagger spec.📝 Summary of Changes
Changes proposed in this pull request:
BagbutikAppStoreConnect_Swift_SDK🧐🗒 Reviewer Notes
💁 Example
TODO...
🔨 How To Test
TODO...