Skip to content

Conversation

@mswilson
Copy link

@mswilson mswilson commented Dec 4, 2025

Updates

  • References

Comments
Correcting CVE reference to CVE-2025-55182, as CVE-2025-66478 is rejected as a duplicate

@github
Copy link
Collaborator

github commented Dec 4, 2025

Hi there @aaronbrown-vercel! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository.

This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the base branch from main to mswilson/advisory-improvement-6503 December 4, 2025 17:25
@mswilson
Copy link
Author

mswilson commented Dec 4, 2025

Noted on the OpenSSF slack channel for the vulnerability disclosure working group:

I think that because CVE-2025-66478 was rejected, some vulnerability databases aren't bringing in GHSA-9qr9-h5gf-34mp because it's still listed as CVE-2025-66478. e.g. I just checked in trivydb and it wasn't there, but other recent ones were. Not 100% sure that's the reason but just thought I'd mention!

@advisory-database advisory-database bot merged commit c1cc137 into mswilson/advisory-improvement-6503 Dec 4, 2025
4 checks passed
@advisory-database
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mswilson! Thank you so much for contributing to the GitHub Advisory Database. This database is free, open, and accessible to all, and it's people like you who make it great. Thanks for choosing to help others. We hope you send in more contributions in the future!

@advisory-database advisory-database bot deleted the mswilson-GHSA-9qr9-h5gf-34mp branch December 4, 2025 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants