Skip to content

Conversation

@techraed
Copy link
Member

Resolves #976

The testing approach should be mentioned. There was an idea to test clients using real node. The problem of this approach is that it's pretty hard to distinguish between testing integration (the client impl itself) and builtin business logic, because builtins must be called properly. As a compromise, builtins could be called with wrong inputs.
That's why codec tests were agreed to be implemented: test no routes are defined in encoded/decoded action data.

@techraed techraed requested review from breathx and vobradovich July 23, 2025 09:33
@techraed techraed self-assigned this Jul 23, 2025
};
use gbuiltin_proxy::{ProxyType as GearProxyType, Request as GearProxyRequest};

// todo [sab] make typeinfo types on gear
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waiting for it gear-tech/gear#4780 be merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: impl remoting-compatible api for gear builtins

2 participants