Standardize License location #1854
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Over the years, it seems that Open-Source projects have standardized on having a since LICENSE file at the top level of the repo and no longer in the source files. Removing the symlink and putting a single LICENSE file at the top.
Moving the explanation that the corpus files may have their own licenses to the README.md file to make it easier for automated tools (like GitHub) to pick up on the fact that if you have a one-line explanation of the project, it's BSD 3-Clause.
Nothing intended to change the license in any way. Just making it more standard in location and language.