feat: add support for exec() #7
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Gankra
previously requested changes
Feb 27, 2024
Contributor
Gankra
left a comment
Gankra
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is unix-specific behaviour, so it needs to be cfg(unix) or whatever (that's why it's in CommandExt, not Command itself)
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/os/unix/process/trait.CommandExt.html#tymethod.exec
i'm not totally sure if we should expose it raw or what
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed we currently support a few of the other methods from the underlying process library, but not
exec().