-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
[#2725] fix(spark)(partition-split): Add fallback under load-balance mode and fix stale assignment missing callback that caused timeout #2729
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b7d5e42
[#2725] fix(spark): Fallback on second split when no servers are avai…
zuston ade6a73
fix
zuston 99f7884
correct logs
zuston d4bfeb0
fix
zuston 3d7a038
detailed message
zuston 6fcde96
fix race condition
zuston 5040fba
add tests
zuston e54434c
ci fix
zuston 0544fac
ci fix
zuston File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -124,27 +124,26 @@ public CompletableFuture<Long> send(AddBlockEvent event) { | |
| String taskId = event.getTaskId(); | ||
| List<ShuffleBlockInfo> blocks = event.getShuffleDataInfoList(); | ||
| List<ShuffleBlockInfo> validBlocks = filterOutStaleAssignmentBlocks(taskId, blocks); | ||
| if (CollectionUtils.isEmpty(validBlocks)) { | ||
| return 0L; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| SendShuffleDataResult result = null; | ||
| try { | ||
| result = | ||
| shuffleWriteClient.sendShuffleData( | ||
| rssAppId, | ||
| event.getStageAttemptNumber(), | ||
| validBlocks, | ||
| () -> !isValidTask(taskId)); | ||
| // completionCallback should be executed before updating taskToSuccessBlockIds | ||
| // structure to avoid side effect | ||
| Set<Long> succeedBlockIds = getSucceedBlockIds(result); | ||
| for (ShuffleBlockInfo block : validBlocks) { | ||
| block.executeCompletionCallback(succeedBlockIds.contains(block.getBlockId())); | ||
| if (CollectionUtils.isNotEmpty(validBlocks)) { | ||
| result = | ||
| shuffleWriteClient.sendShuffleData( | ||
| rssAppId, | ||
| event.getStageAttemptNumber(), | ||
| validBlocks, | ||
| () -> !isValidTask(taskId)); | ||
| // completionCallback should be executed before updating taskToSuccessBlockIds | ||
| // structure to avoid side effect | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could u elaborate more about side effect?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. original logic |
||
| Set<Long> succeedBlockIds = getSucceedBlockIds(result); | ||
| for (ShuffleBlockInfo block : validBlocks) { | ||
| block.executeCompletionCallback(succeedBlockIds.contains(block.getBlockId())); | ||
| } | ||
| putBlockId(taskToSuccessBlockIds, taskId, result.getSuccessBlockIds()); | ||
| putFailedBlockSendTracker( | ||
| taskToFailedBlockSendTracker, taskId, result.getFailedBlockSendTracker()); | ||
| } | ||
| putBlockId(taskToSuccessBlockIds, taskId, result.getSuccessBlockIds()); | ||
| putFailedBlockSendTracker( | ||
| taskToFailedBlockSendTracker, taskId, result.getFailedBlockSendTracker()); | ||
| } finally { | ||
| WriteBufferManager bufferManager = event.getBufferManager(); | ||
| if (bufferManager != null && result != null) { | ||
|
|
@@ -159,6 +158,9 @@ public CompletableFuture<Long> send(AddBlockEvent event) { | |
| runnable.run(); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if (CollectionUtils.isEmpty(validBlocks)) { | ||
| return 0L; | ||
| } | ||
| Set<Long> succeedBlockIds = getSucceedBlockIds(result); | ||
| return validBlocks.stream() | ||
| .filter(x -> succeedBlockIds.contains(x.getBlockId())) | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually this is a strategy. Maybe it will better to separate mechanism and strategy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change targets the second-split scenario where all load-balanced servers have already been split.
In this case, we should fall back to selecting a server using the hash-based algorithm.
At the current stage, this approach is sufficient for large-scale partition workloads. Introducing additional mechanisms would add unnecessary complexity without clear benefit.