Create rust.yml

[SpeedSX]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@SpeedSX has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2ad59e5 and 8a2871b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/rust.yml (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

Introduces a GitHub Actions workflow at .github/workflows/rust.yml for a Rust project. The workflow triggers on pushes to the main branch and pull requests targeting main. It sets the environment variable CARGO_TERM_COLOR=always. A single job named build runs on ubuntu-latest and performs the following steps: checks out the repository, executes cargo build --verbose, and runs cargo test --verbose. No public API or exported declarations are modified.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	❓ Inconclusive	No pull request description was provided by the author. While the absence of a description is not ideal for code review and documentation purposes, the evaluation criteria for this check require assessing whether the description is related to the changeset. Since no description exists at all (rather than an unrelated or off-topic one), this situation falls into a gray area where there is insufficient information to make a definitive assessment about relevance.	The author should add a pull request description explaining the purpose and context of adding this GitHub Actions workflow. A brief description such as "Adds a CI/CD workflow for the Rust project to automatically build and test code on pushes and pull requests to main" would provide valuable context for reviewers and future reference. Even a minimal description helps with project documentation and makes the PR more maintainable.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "Create rust.yml" accurately describes the main change in this PR, which is the addition of a new GitHub Actions workflow file named rust.yml. While the title is brief and could be more descriptive about the purpose (e.g., "Add CI workflow for Rust project"), it directly and clearly identifies the primary file being created. The title is concise, specific to the actual change, and allows teammates to understand what was added even if it doesn't convey the full context of why.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🧪 Early access (Sonnet 4.5): enabled

We are currently testing the Sonnet 4.5 model, which is expected to improve code review quality. However, this model may lead to increased noise levels in the review comments. Please disable the early access features if the noise level causes any inconvenience.

Note:

• Public repositories are always opted into early access features.
• You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/rust.yml (1)

17-22: Consider adding dependency caching and additional checks.

The workflow is functional, but you could improve build performance and code quality by:

1. Adding cargo dependency caching to speed up subsequent builds
2. Adding cargo clippy for linting
3. Adding cargo fmt --check to enforce formatting

Apply this diff to add these improvements:

     steps:
     - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+    - name: Cache cargo dependencies
+      uses: actions/cache@v3
+      with:
+        path: |
+          ~/.cargo/bin/
+          ~/.cargo/registry/index/
+          ~/.cargo/registry/cache/
+          ~/.cargo/git/db/
+          target/
+        key: ${{ runner.os }}-cargo-${{ hashFiles('**/Cargo.lock') }}
+    - name: Check formatting
+      run: cargo fmt --check
+    - name: Run clippy
+      run: cargo clippy -- -D warnings
     - name: Build
       run: cargo build --verbose
     - name: Run tests
       run: cargo test --verbose

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb4233b and 2ad59e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/rust.yml (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.github/workflows/rust.yml (2)

3-7: LGTM!

The workflow triggers are appropriately configured for continuous integration on the main branch.

---

9-15: LGTM!

The environment configuration and job setup follow GitHub Actions best practices for Rust projects.