Feat/access requests#46
Merged
woutslabbinck merged 55 commits intoSolidLabResearch:feat/odrlfrom Oct 12, 2025
Merged
Conversation
…ea in documentation
…related code) to OdrlController
…e selected controller in the store
Comment on lines
+16
to
+18
| Future implementations should aim to make the swapping of controllers as easily configurable as possible. | ||
| A single `configuration` object that is tailored to the needs of each controller should be sufficient. | ||
| The current implementation simply passes the URL of the authorization server for the `ODRLController`. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Future work should actually have this discoverable.
In the sense that there should be a document tied to the identity of the user (speaking WebID terms, the WEbid Profile Document).
In that document the URLs of different authorization servers + mechanism should be elaborated (or the mechanisms of authorization should be mentioned through the /.well-known/ route.
Comment on lines
+23
to
+27
| Please provide your own WebID for authorization: | ||
| What do you want to name your policy? | ||
| Please enter the URL to the resource: | ||
| Please provide the WebID for the assignee: | ||
| Enter actions to associate (comma separated). Options: read, write, append, create, control: read |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could you fill in the variables from the policy to make it clear?
Comment on lines
+61
to
+83
| for (const action of actions) { | ||
| const rule = getRandomName(); | ||
|
|
||
| rules.push(` | ||
| ex:${rule} a odrl:Permission ; | ||
| odrl:action odrl:${action} ; | ||
| odrl:target <${target}> ; | ||
| odrl:assignee <${assignee}> ; | ||
| odrl:assigner <${webid}> .`); | ||
|
|
||
| ruleRefs.push(`ex:${rule}`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const body = ` | ||
| @prefix ex: <http://example.org/>. | ||
| @prefix odrl: <http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/> . | ||
| @prefix dct: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>. | ||
|
|
||
| ex:${policy} a odrl:Agreement ; | ||
| ${ruleRefs.map(r => `odrl:permission ${r} ;`).join("\n ")} | ||
| odrl:uid ex:${policy} . | ||
| ${rules.join("\n")} | ||
| `; |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think at this point, using N3 store and writer would make it easier than doing the manual writing of turtle.
Co-authored-by: Wout Slabbinck <wout.slabbinck@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wout Slabbinck <wout.slabbinck@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wout Slabbinck <wout.slabbinck@gmail.com>
|
|
||
| ## Use Case | ||
|
|
||
| We'll be looking into the use case of getting permission such that later we can access the resource using the UMA protocol. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| We'll be looking into the use case of getting permission such that later we can access the resource using the UMA protocol. | |
| We'll be looking into the use case of requesting access such that later we can access the resource using the UMA protocol. |
| We'll be looking into the use case of getting permission such that later we can access the resource using the UMA protocol. | ||
| This resource is managed by a Resource Server (RS). | ||
| The Resource Owner (RO) can alter the policies on their resources via the Authorization Server (AS). | ||
| The AS enforces the policies set by the RO when the RP interacts with the RS (possibly through a Client). |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| The AS enforces the policies set by the RO when the RP interacts with the RS (possibly through a Client). | |
| The AS enforces the policies set by the RO when the RP interacts with the RS using a UMA compliant Client. |
Collaborator
woutslabbinck
left a comment
woutslabbinck
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've added some extra comments to the documentation.
Comment on lines
+16
to
+18
| <!-- TODO: this visualization is not completely correct and should be updated --> | ||
|
|
||
|  |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you update the figure?
Comment on lines
+113
to
+114
| This **PATCH** should include a body of format `application/sparql-update`, which uses a **DELETE/INSERT** statement to update the request's status to either `req:accepted` or `req:denied`. | ||
| In our use case, this message should look like this: |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Highlight that these are the only triples that can be updated
|
|
||
| ## Data Space Contract Negotiation Protocol flow | ||
|
|
||
| This section explains the message flow for the second option: using the [Data Space Contract Negotiation Procotol](https://eclipse-dataspace-protocol-base.github.io/DataspaceProtocol/2025-1-RC4/#negotiation-protocol). Important to note is that this document is not an official W3C Membership consensus. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| This section explains the message flow for the second option: using the [Data Space Contract Negotiation Procotol](https://eclipse-dataspace-protocol-base.github.io/DataspaceProtocol/2025-1-RC4/#negotiation-protocol). Important to note is that this document is not an official W3C Membership consensus. | |
| This section explains the message flow for the second option: using the [Data Space Contract Negotiation Procotol](https://eclipse-dataspace-protocol-base.github.io/DataspaceProtocol/2025-1-RC4/#negotiation-protocol) (DSCNP). Important to note is that this document is not an official W3C Membership consensus. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.