Skip to content

Conversation

@ESadek-MO
Copy link
Contributor

@ESadek-MO ESadek-MO commented Jul 31, 2025

🚀 Pull Request

Related #4799
Closes #6498

Left to do:

  • Add mention of the cultural changes we wish to see Minutes removed from PR
  • Double check the minutes make sense Minutes removed from PR
  • (Once merged) Add a reference to the docs in Iris User Experience #6594

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.00%. Comparing base (b62c743) to head (8ef66ed).
⚠️ Report is 205 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6595      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.89%   90.00%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          90       91       +1     
  Lines       24138    24447     +309     
  Branches     4492     4567      +75     
==========================================
+ Hits        21699    22004     +305     
+ Misses       1679     1676       -3     
- Partials      760      767       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@trexfeathers trexfeathers self-assigned this Jul 31, 2025
@ESadek-MO
Copy link
Contributor Author

@trexfeathers

I agree with most comments here, the minutes page I had forseen being a bit of a mess anyway, and putting it as a discussion seems wise.

Adding the discussion guide to Philosophy feels a little crammed in. I could happily be vetoed, my feelings aren't strong, but it feels a bit like it's not so much a philosophy as it is guiding a process. The philosophy would be "we're having regular meetings, because".

@trexfeathers
Copy link
Contributor

Adding the discussion guide to Philosophy feels a little crammed in. I could happily be vetoed, my feelings aren't strong, but it feels a bit like it's not so much a philosophy as it is guiding a process. The philosophy would be "we're having regular meetings, because".

Yes I see your point, let's not mess with the Philosophy page

@scitools-ci scitools-ci bot removed this from 🚴 Peloton Sep 24, 2025
@trexfeathers trexfeathers merged commit 6d63a90 into SciTools:main Dec 8, 2025
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create guide to guide future UX discussions

2 participants