fix map error

[nsavinda]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved error handling in the submission process, ensuring users receive feedback regardless of submission status.
  • Enhanced robustness in feedback processing to prevent errors when encountering undefined values.

• New Features

  • Updated scoring calculations for a more accurate display of total and maximum possible scores.
  • Simplified text in grading criteria for clarity.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@nsavinda has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 28 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01fb555 and 75bc7cf.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the highlightTextWithFeedback and handleSubmit functions within the ExamSetterGrade component located in src/pages/examSetter/Grade.tsx. Modifications include the implementation of optional chaining for the feedback parameter to prevent errors when it is undefined. The handleSubmit function now includes a static grade value and has adjusted error handling to ensure a success message is displayed regardless of submission outcomes.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
src/pages/examSetter/Grade.tsx	- Updated highlightTextWithFeedback to use optional chaining for feedback mapping.
	- Modified handleSubmit to include a static grade value and adjusted error handling for user feedback.
	- Function signatures for highlightTextWithFeedback and handleSubmit updated internally.
	- Export statement for ExamSetterGrade remains unchanged.

Possibly related PRs

• Update CandidateAllExams.tsx #44: The changes in CandidateAllExams.tsx involve enhancements to the exam data presentation, which may relate to the overall user experience in the grading process.
• Added Candidate Exam summary availability status  #56: The ExamSummary.tsx changes introduce new state variables and logic for exam availability, which could indirectly relate to the grading process.
• Candidate - Exam Feedback #70: The TimeContainer.tsx changes include navigation logic for exam submission, relevant to the overall flow of grading and feedback.
• Grading updated #98: The changes in examServiceTypes.ts and ExamServices.ts introduce new interfaces and methods for managing grades, directly relating to the grading functionalities.
• Dev/ns/grading #118: The new grading interfaces and functions in AIAssistant.ts directly relate to the grading process, enhancing the functionality of grading questions.
• Kaumadi #127: The modifications in ExamSetter.ts for proctoring exams and candidates are part of the broader exam management context that includes grading functionalities.

Suggested reviewers

• Kaumadi2k

🐇 In the meadow, where feedback flows,
A function grows, with scores that glow.
With chains of options, errors now flee,
A submit that smiles, for all to see!
Let's hop along, with grades so bright,
In the world of exams, everything feels right! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)

src/pages/examSetter/Grade.tsx (2)

Line range hint 279-307: Fix critical issues in grade submission logic

There are several concerning issues in the submission logic:

1. The grade field is hardcoded as "status" instead of using the calculated status
2. Success message is shown even when submission fails
3. Navigation occurs regardless of success/failure

Apply these changes to fix the issues:

     const gradePayload = {
         examID,
         candidateID,
-        grade: "status",  // This seems incorrect; usually, this would be dynamic or calculated
+        grade: status,    // Use the calculated status
         score: totalScore.toString(),
         status
     };

     try {
         const response = await submitGrades(gradePayload);
         console.log("Submission Response:", response.data);
         message.success("Grading submitted successfully!");
         navigate('/examsetter/grading'); // Redirect after submission
     } catch (error) {
-        // console.error("Failed to submit grading:", error);
-        message.error("Failed to submit grading.");
-        message.success("Grading submitted successfully!");
-
-        navigate('/examsetter/grading'); // Redirect after submission
+        console.error("Failed to submit grading:", error);
+        message.error("Failed to submit grading. Please try again.");
+        return; // Don't navigate on error
     }

---

Line range hint 1-400: Address architectural and security concerns

Several architectural improvements are recommended:

1. Hard-coded IDs:

   • Replace examID = '1' and candidateID = '2' with values from props or context
   • Consider using environment variables for sensitive data

2. Input Validation:

   • Add validation for score submissions
   • Implement proper error boundaries

3. Security:

   • Add proper authentication checks
   • Implement rate limiting for AI grading
   • Add loading states and error handling for all API calls

4. Type Safety:

   • Add proper TypeScript interfaces for API responses
   • Consider using Zod or similar for runtime type validation

Would you like me to help implement any of these improvements?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28bbdee and 3745447.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/pages/examSetter/Grade.tsx (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/pages/examSetter/Grade.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-400: Verify component usage and dependencies

Let's verify the impact of these changes on the rest of the codebase.