Backend is updated #65
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant enhancements to the exam management system by adding multiple new endpoints in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/repository/ExamRepository.java (1)
34-35: Add Javadoc documentation for the new method.Please add documentation to describe the method's purpose, parameters, and return value.
+ /** + * Retrieves all exams assigned to a specific moderator. + * + * @param moderatorId the ID of the moderator + * @return list of exams moderated by the specified moderator + */ List<Exam> findByModeratorId(long moderatorId);src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/EmailSenderImpl.java (1)
Line range hint
1-42: Consider implementing a more flexible email service architecture.Given that this email service is used by multiple components (AuthenticationService and ExamManagementServiceImpl), consider these architectural improvements:
- Implement an email template system
- Support different email types (confirmation, notification, alerts)
- Add email queuing for better scalability
Would you like me to provide a detailed design proposal for these improvements?
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/QuestionResponse.java (2)
17-17: Consider adding validation and documentation for the comment fieldWhile the addition of the comment field is straightforward, consider these improvements:
- Add validation constraints (e.g.,
@Size(max=...)) to prevent excessively long comments- Add Javadoc to document the purpose and usage of comments in the context of exam questions
Example implementation:
+ /** + * Optional feedback or notes provided by moderators/exam setters for this question. + * This field is used to store review comments, improvement suggestions, or general notes. + */ + @Size(max = 1000, message = "Comment cannot exceed 1000 characters") private String comment; // New attribute
Line range hint
13-14: Consider using enums for questionType and difficultyLevelCurrently using Strings for fixed-value fields. Consider converting these to proper enum types for better type safety and maintainability.
Example implementation:
public enum QuestionType { MCQ, ESSAY } public enum DifficultyLevel { EASY, MEDIUM, HARD }Then update the fields:
- private String questionType; // "MCQ" or "Essay" - private String difficultyLevel; // "EASY", "MEDIUM" or "HARD" + private QuestionType questionType; + private DifficultyLevel difficultyLevel;src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/model/Question.java (1)
36-37: Consider additional implementation detailsSince this is a new field that can be null:
- Consider adding validation rules in the service layer if there are any business rules around when comments can be added/modified
- Update relevant documentation/API specs to reflect this new field
- Consider adding appropriate indexes if you plan to query by comments
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/RealTimeMonitoringResponse.java (1)
5-10: Add class-level documentation.Please add Javadoc documentation to describe the purpose and usage of this response class, including details about when it's used in the API.
@Builder +/** + * Response class for real-time monitoring status of an exam. + * Used by the exam management API to return monitoring status and associated Zoom meeting details. + */ public class RealTimeMonitoringResponse {src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/AuthenticationService.java (2)
220-223: Enhance email template with HTML formatting and security informationThe current email template is plain text and lacks important security information that could help prevent phishing attacks.
Consider enhancing the email template with:
- HTML formatting for better presentation
- Security tips (e.g., "Never share this link")
- Contact information for support
- Your organization's logo and branding
Example implementation:
private String buildEmail(String name, String link) { - return "Hi " + name + ",\n\n" + - "Thank you for registering. Please click on the link below to activate your account:\n\n" + - link + "\n\n" + - "The link will expire in 15 minutes.\n\n" + - "See you soon."; + return """ + <html> + <body style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; padding: 20px;"> + <div style="max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto;"> + <h2>Welcome to Testify!</h2> + <p>Hi %s,</p> + <p>Thank you for registering. Please click the button below to activate your account:</p> + <p style="text-align: center;"> + <a href="%s" style="background-color: #4CAF50; color: white; padding: 14px 20px; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 4px;"> + Activate Account + </a> + </p> + <p><strong>Important Security Notes:</strong></p> + <ul> + <li>This link will expire in 15 minutes</li> + <li>Never share this link with anyone</li> + <li>We will never ask for your password via email</li> + </ul> + <p>If you didn't create this account, please ignore this email.</p> + <p>Need help? Contact our support team at support@testify.com</p> + </div> + </body> + </html> + """.formatted(name, link);Also, update the
EmailSenderinterface to specify that it accepts HTML content:void send(String to, String htmlContent);Also applies to: 291-295
Line range hint
1-400: Consider refactoring the registration flow for better maintainabilityThe
registermethod is handling multiple concerns and has grown quite large. This makes it harder to maintain and test.Consider the following architectural improvements:
- Extract user creation logic into separate services for each role:
@Service public class CandidateRegistrationService { public User registerCandidate(RegistrationRequest request) { // Candidate-specific registration logic } } @Service public class ExamSetterRegistrationService { public User registerExamSetter(RegistrationRequest request) { // ExamSetter-specific registration logic } }
- Move verification document handling to a dedicated service:
@Service public class VerificationDocumentService { public void handleVerificationDocuments(Organization org, MultipartFile[] documents) { // Document handling logic } }
- Make the token expiration time configurable:
# application.properties app.security.token.expiration-minutes=15Would you like me to help create these service classes or open issues to track these improvements?
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/ExamSetterService.java (1)
16-17: Consider adding method documentation.The method signature is clear and appropriate. Consider adding Javadoc to document the purpose, parameters, and return value.
+ /** + * Retrieves a list of exams being moderated by a specific exam setter. + * @param examSetterId The ID of the exam setter + * @return List of exams being moderated by the exam setter + */ List<ModerateExamResponse> getModeratingExams(long examSetterId);src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/controller/ExamManagementController.java (1)
198-273: Consider Implementing a Global Exception HandlerThe repetitive exception handling code across multiple endpoints suggests the need for a centralized approach. Implementing a global exception handler using
@ControllerAdvicecan improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/ExamManagementServiceImpl.java (2)
1201-1378: Consider Centralizing Exception Handling in Service LayerMultiple service methods lack consistent exception handling. Implement a strategy to handle exceptions centrally, which enhances code maintainability and consistency.
1275-1310: Optimize Email Notifications to CandidatesIn the
notifyCandidatesmethod, sending emails inside a loop may be inefficient and could lead to performance issues. Consider batching email sends or using asynchronous processing.src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/model/Exam.java (2)
105-116: Add documentation for new monitoring and control fields.Please add Javadoc comments to explain:
- The purpose and behavior of each new field
- Any dependencies between fields (e.g., realTimeMonitoring and zoomLink)
- Valid values and constraints
Example:
/** * Indicates if real-time monitoring is enabled for this exam. * When enabled, proctors can monitor candidates through the zoomLink. */ @Column(nullable = false) private boolean realTimeMonitoring = false;
105-116: Consider enforcing logical constraints between monitoring fields.The relationship between these fields needs validation:
- realTimeMonitoring likely requires a valid zoomLink
- browserLockdown might be required when realTimeMonitoring is enabled
Consider adding a validation method:
@PrePersist @PreUpdate private void validateMonitoringConstraints() { if (realTimeMonitoring && (zoomLink == null || zoomLink.trim().isEmpty())) { throw new IllegalStateException("Real-time monitoring requires a Zoom link"); } }src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/ExamManagementService.java (2)
53-54: Add documentation for real-time monitoring methods.Please add Javadoc comments explaining:
- Expected behavior
- Parameter constraints
- Error conditions
Example:
/** * Updates the real-time monitoring settings for an exam. * * @param examId ID of the exam to update * @param dto Contains monitoring settings including Zoom link * @return GenericResponse indicating success or failure * @throws ExamNotFoundException if exam doesn't exist * @throws UnauthorizedException if user lacks permission */ GenericResponse updateRealTimeMonitoring(Long examId, RealTimeMonitoringRequest dto);
65-65: Consider versioning for question comments.The question comment update method should potentially track comment history for audit purposes.
Consider extending the functionality:
/** * Updates a question's comment while maintaining version history. * * @param questionId ID of the question * @param comment New comment text * @return Response containing the updated comment with version info */ GenericAddOrUpdateResponse<QuestionCommentResponse> updateQuestionComment( Long questionId, String comment );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/controller/ExamManagementController.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/controller/ExamSetterController.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/model/Exam.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/model/ExamSetter.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/model/Question.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/repository/CandidateRepository.java(0 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/repository/ExamRepository.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/repository/QuestionRepository.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/requests/exam_management/ModeratorRequest.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/requests/exam_management/QuestionCommentRequest.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/requests/exam_management/RealTimeMonitoringRequest.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/GenericResponse.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/BrowserLockdownResponse.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/ExamResponse.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/HostedResponse.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/ModeratorResponse.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/QuestionResponse.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/RealTimeMonitoringResponse.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/examsetter_management/ModerateExamResponse.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/AuthenticationService.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/CandidateService.java(0 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/EmailSenderImpl.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/ExamManagementService.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/ExamManagementServiceImpl.java(6 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/ExamSetterService.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/ExamSetterServiceImpl.java(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/repository/CandidateRepository.java
- src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/CandidateService.java
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/model/ExamSetter.java
- src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/requests/exam_management/ModeratorRequest.java
- src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/BrowserLockdownResponse.java
- src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/HostedResponse.java
- src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/requests/exam_management/QuestionCommentRequest.java
- src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/examsetter_management/ModerateExamResponse.java
🔇 Additional comments (15)
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/repository/ExamRepository.java (1)
34-35: The method implementation follows Spring Data JPA conventions.
The new query method is correctly defined following Spring Data JPA naming conventions.
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/GenericResponse.java (1)
12-13: Verify impact of breaking changes
The removal of the code and content fields represents breaking changes that could impact existing API consumers. The content field removal particularly limits the class's ability to carry response data.
Consider:
- Maintaining backward compatibility through versioning
- Adding a replacement for the generic
contentfield - Documenting migration steps for API consumers
Let's verify the usage of these fields across the codebase:
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/EmailSenderImpl.java (1)
22-22: LGTM! Constructor injection is properly implemented.
The dependency injection approach using constructor injection with @AllArgsConstructor follows Spring best practices.
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/QuestionResponse.java (2)
Line range hint 7-11: LGTM! Well-structured response class
The class follows best practices with appropriate Lombok annotations and builder pattern implementation.
Line range hint 1-20: Verify integration with ExamManagementController
Let's confirm that the new comment field is properly handled in the related controller endpoint.
✅ Verification successful
Integration with comment field is properly implemented
The codebase shows complete integration of the comment field:
- ExamManagementController has a dedicated endpoint
/question/commentto handle comment updates - ExamManagementServiceImpl properly sets and retrieves the comment field in:
updateQuestionCommentmethod for updating comments- Question response builder includes comment in the response mapping
- Full service-to-controller integration is present with proper request/response handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the question comment endpoint implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class ExamManagementController {
$$$
@$_($$$)
$_($$$) updateQuestionComment($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for any direct usage of QuestionResponse's comment field
rg -l "QuestionResponse.*comment" --type java
Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the ExamManagementController file
fd "ExamManagementController.java"
# Search for any method that handles question updates
rg -A 5 "updateQuestion|saveQuestion|createQuestion" --type java
# Let's also check for any service layer handling of question comments
rg -A 5 "question.*comment|comment.*question" --type java
# Check for any QuestionResponse usage
rg -A 3 "QuestionResponse" --type java
Length of output: 13850
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/repository/QuestionRepository.java (2)
9-9: LGTM: Import addition is appropriate
The Optional import is required for the new method's return type.
15-15: LGTM: Well-designed repository method
The new method follows Spring Data JPA naming conventions and maintains consistency with the existing soft delete pattern. Using Optional as the return type is appropriate for single-result queries.
Let's verify the usage of this method:
✅ Verification successful
Method implementation and usage verified successfully
The method is correctly used in ExamManagementServiceImpl where it:
- Properly handles the Optional return type using orElseThrow
- Provides appropriate error messaging when question is not found
- Maintains the soft-delete pattern as intended
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of the new method to ensure it's being utilized appropriately
rg -l "findByIdAndIsDeletedFalse" --type java
Length of output: 203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how the method is used in the service implementation
rg "findByIdAndIsDeletedFalse" src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/service/ExamManagementServiceImpl.java -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 394
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/model/Question.java (1)
36-37: Consider code organization improvements
- The inline comment "// New attribute" is unnecessary and should be removed as version control already tracks changes.
- Consider grouping this field with other similar attributes for better code organization.
- @Column
- private String comment; // New attribute
+ @Column
+ private String comment;Let's check for database migration scripts:
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/controller/ExamManagementController.java (4)
221-231: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Standardize Exception Handling and Avoid Exposing Internal Errors
In the updateBrowserLockdown method, similar to previous methods, returning the exception message may expose sensitive information. Consistently handle exceptions by logging and returning generic error messages.
Apply this diff:
} catch (Exception ex) {
- return ResponseEntity.status(500).body(new GenericResponse("false", "Error: " + ex.getMessage()));
+ log.error("Failed to update browser lockdown for examId {}: {}", examId, ex.getMessage());
+ return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR)
+ .body(new GenericResponse("false", "An unexpected error occurred while updating browser lockdown."));
}233-241:
Avoid Returning null on Exception and Provide Meaningful Responses
In the getBrowserLockdown method, returning null upon catching an exception may cause issues for the client. Return a meaningful response instead.
Apply this diff:
} catch (Exception ex) {
- return ResponseEntity.status(500).body(null); // Handle errors gracefully
+ log.error("Failed to retrieve browser lockdown status for examId {}: {}", examId, ex.getMessage());
+ BrowserLockdownResponse errorResponse = new BrowserLockdownResponse(false);
+ return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR).body(errorResponse);
}243-251: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consistent Exception Handling and Security
In the updateHosted method, ensure exceptions are handled consistently to prevent exposure of sensitive information.
Apply this diff:
} catch (Exception ex) {
- return ResponseEntity.status(500).body(new GenericResponse("false", "Error: " + ex.getMessage()));
+ log.error("Failed to update hosted status for examId {}: {}", examId, ex.getMessage());
+ return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR)
+ .body(new GenericResponse("false", "An unexpected error occurred while updating hosted status."));
}253-262:
Return Valid Responses Instead of null on Exception
In getHosted, avoid returning null in the response body when exceptions occur. Provide a default response and log the exception.
Apply this diff:
} catch (Exception ex) {
- return ResponseEntity.status(500).body(null);
+ log.error("Failed to retrieve hosted status for examId {}: {}", examId, ex.getMessage());
+ HostedResponse errorResponse = new HostedResponse(false);
+ return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR).body(errorResponse);
}src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/ModeratorResponse.java (1)
1-14: LGTM!
The ModeratorResponse class is well-defined with appropriate fields and annotations.
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/requests/exam_management/RealTimeMonitoringRequest.java (1)
1-15: LGTM!
The RealTimeMonitoringRequest class is correctly implemented with necessary fields and Lombok annotations.
src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/ExamResponse.java (1)
35-38: Ensure Consistency in JSON Serialization
Verify that the newly added boolean fields (realTimeMonitoring, browserLockdown, hosted) and zoomLink are correctly serialized/deserialized in JSON responses.
Run the following script to check if the fields are included and correctly named in the JSON output:
✅ Verification successful
No JSON serialization issues expected
The class uses Lombok annotations (@Getter, @Setter, @AllArgsConstructor, @NoArgsConstructor, @Builder) which automatically generates standard getters and setters. In Spring Boot applications with default configuration:
- All fields will be automatically serialized using their exact names
- Boolean fields will be correctly serialized as JSON booleans
- String fields will be correctly serialized as JSON strings
The class follows standard Java naming conventions and doesn't use any custom JSON annotations, which means the default Jackson serialization will work correctly for all fields including the newly added ones:
realTimeMonitoring→"realTimeMonitoring": booleanzoomLink→"zoomLink": stringbrowserLockdown→"browserLockdown": booleanhosted→"hosted": boolean
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check JSON serialization of ExamResponse fields
# Assuming the project uses Jackson for JSON serialization
# Search for @JsonProperty annotations or any custom serializers
rg '@JsonProperty|@JsonSerialize|@JsonDeserialize' src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/ExamResponse.java
# Alternatively, check for custom getters/setters that may affect serialization
Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check the entire content of the ExamResponse.java file
cat src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/ExamResponse.java
# Also check for any Jackson annotations in the parent classes if this class extends another
rg -l "class.*ExamResponse.*extends" src/main/java/com/testify/Testify_Backend/responses/exam_management/
# Check for any custom serialization configurations in the Spring configuration files
fd -e java -e xml -e properties -e yml | xargs rg -l "ObjectMapper|Jackson"
Length of output: 1382
|
|
||
| List<Exam> findByModeratorId(long moderatorId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding pagination and sorting support.
For better scalability and performance, consider modifying the method to support pagination and sorting, especially if the number of exams per moderator could be large.
- List<Exam> findByModeratorId(long moderatorId);
+ Page<Exam> findByModeratorId(long moderatorId, Pageable pageable);Usage example in service layer:
Pageable pageable = PageRequest.of(0, 10, Sort.by("startDatetime").descending());
Page<Exam> moderatorExams = examRepository.findByModeratorId(moderatorId, pageable);| @Data | ||
| public class GenericResponse { | ||
| private String code; | ||
| private String success; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using Boolean for the 'success' field
The success field would be more appropriately typed as boolean rather than String, as it represents a binary state (success/failure). This would:
- Provide type safety
- Make the API more intuitive
- Prevent invalid string values
- private String success;
+ private boolean success;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private String success; | |
| private boolean success; |
| try { | ||
| MimeMessage mimeMessage = mailSender.createMimeMessage(); | ||
| MimeMessageHelper helper = | ||
| new MimeMessageHelper(mimeMessage, "utf-8"); | ||
| helper.setText(email, true); | ||
| helper.setTo(to); | ||
| helper.setSubject("Confirm your email"); | ||
| helper.setFrom("hello@amigoscode.com"); | ||
| mailSender.send(mimeMessage); | ||
| } catch (MessagingException e) { | ||
| LOGGER.error("failed to send email", e); | ||
| throw new IllegalStateException("failed to send email"); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Several improvements needed in the email sending implementation.
- The subject and from address are hardcoded, which limits flexibility and reusability
- The error handling could be more specific to different types of messaging exceptions
- Missing input validation for the 'to' and 'email' parameters
- No logging for successful email sending
Consider applying these improvements:
@Override
@Async
public void send(String to, String email) {
+ if (to == null || to.isEmpty() || email == null || email.isEmpty()) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Email recipient and content cannot be null or empty");
+ }
try {
MimeMessage mimeMessage = mailSender.createMimeMessage();
MimeMessageHelper helper =
new MimeMessageHelper(mimeMessage, "utf-8");
helper.setText(email, true);
helper.setTo(to);
- helper.setSubject("Confirm your email");
- helper.setFrom("hello@amigoscode.com");
+ helper.setSubject(emailProperties.getSubject());
+ helper.setFrom(emailProperties.getFromAddress());
mailSender.send(mimeMessage);
+ LOGGER.info("Successfully sent email to: {}", to);
} catch (MessagingException e) {
LOGGER.error("failed to send email", e);
- throw new IllegalStateException("failed to send email");
+ throw new EmailSendingException("Failed to send email: " + e.getMessage(), e);
}Additional changes needed:
- Create an
EmailPropertiesconfiguration class - Create a custom
EmailSendingExceptionclass - Add the following properties to
application.properties:
email.subject=Confirm your email
email.from-address=hello@amigoscode.com| LOGGER.error("failed to send email", e); | ||
| throw new IllegalStateException("failed to send email"); | ||
| } | ||
| System.out.println("Skipping email sending during development."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove misleading development skip message.
The print statement contradicts the actual behavior of the code. If development mode is needed, consider these alternatives:
- Use a configuration property to control email sending
- Use Spring profiles to manage different environments
Here's a suggested implementation:
- System.out.println("Skipping email sending during development.");Add to application.properties:
email.enabled=trueAnd modify the send method:
@Override
@Async
public void send(String to, String email) {
+ if (!emailProperties.isEnabled()) {
+ LOGGER.info("Email sending is disabled. Skipping email to: {}", to);
+ return;
+ }
try {
// ... existing code ...| private boolean realTimeMonitoring; | ||
| private String zoomLink; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding field validation and documentation.
The fields need documentation and potential validation:
- The
zoomLinkfield could be null when real-time monitoring is disabled - The format and security implications of the Zoom link should be documented
+ /**
+ * Indicates whether real-time monitoring is enabled for the exam.
+ */
private boolean realTimeMonitoring;
+
+ /**
+ * The Zoom meeting link for real-time monitoring.
+ * This field may be null when real-time monitoring is disabled.
+ */
+ @Builder.Default
private String zoomLink;Additionally, consider:
- Adding validation to ensure the Zoom link follows a valid format
- Implementing security measures to prevent unauthorized access to Zoom meetings
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| // Convert grades to responses, even if the list is empty | ||
| List<GradeResponse> gradeResponses = grades.stream() | ||
| .map(grade -> new GradeResponse(grade.getId(), grade.getGrade(), grade.getMinMarks(), grade.getMaxMarks())) | ||
| .collect(Collectors.toList()); | ||
|
|
||
| return ResponseEntity.ok(gradeResponses); | ||
| } catch (RuntimeException ex) { | ||
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND).body(null); | ||
| } catch (Exception ex) { | ||
| log.error("An error occurred while fetching grades for examId {}: {}", examId, ex.getMessage()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Return Appropriate Error Responses Instead of null
In getGradesByExamId, when an exception occurs, returning null may lead to client-side errors. Consider returning an error message or an empty list.
Apply this diff:
} catch (Exception ex) {
log.error("An error occurred while fetching grades for examId {}: {}", examId, ex.getMessage());
- return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR).body(null);
+ return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR)
+ .body(Collections.emptyList()); // Return an empty list or an appropriate error response
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @Transactional | ||
| public GenericResponse updateRealTimeMonitoring(Long examId, RealTimeMonitoringRequest dto) { | ||
| // Fetch the exam by ID | ||
| Exam exam = examRepository.findById(examId) | ||
| .orElseThrow(() -> new RuntimeException("Exam not found with ID: " + examId)); | ||
|
|
||
| // Update the fields | ||
| exam.setRealTimeMonitoring(dto.isRealTimeMonitoring()); | ||
| if (dto.isRealTimeMonitoring()) { | ||
| // If activating, set the Zoom link | ||
| exam.setZoomLink(dto.getZoomLink()); | ||
| } else { | ||
| // If deactivating, clear the Zoom link | ||
| exam.setZoomLink(null); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Save the updated exam | ||
| examRepository.save(exam); | ||
|
|
||
| // Create and return a success response | ||
| String message = dto.isRealTimeMonitoring() ? | ||
| "Real-time monitoring activated successfully." : | ||
| "Real-time monitoring deactivated successfully."; | ||
| return new GenericResponse("true", message); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add Exception Handling to Service Methods and Log Errors
In updateRealTimeMonitoring, exceptions are not caught, which may lead to unhandled exceptions and unclear error propagation. It's advisable to handle exceptions, log them, and return meaningful responses.
Apply this diff:
public GenericResponse updateRealTimeMonitoring(Long examId, RealTimeMonitoringRequest dto) {
+ try {
// Existing logic
+ } catch (Exception ex) {
+ log.error("Failed to update real-time monitoring for examId {}: {}", examId, ex.getMessage());
+ return new GenericResponse("false", "An unexpected error occurred while updating real-time monitoring.");
+ }
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @Column | ||
| private String zoomLink; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for zoomLink format.
The zoomLink field should be validated to ensure it contains a valid Zoom meeting URL.
Consider adding validation:
@Pattern(regexp = "^https?://[a-zA-Z0-9-.]+\\.zoom\\.us/[a-zA-Z0-9-/]+$",
message = "Invalid Zoom meeting URL format")
@Column
private String zoomLink;| void assignModerator(Long examId, String moderatorEmail); | ||
| ModeratorResponse getModeratorDetails(Long examId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add security validation for moderator assignment.
The moderator assignment method needs careful security consideration:
- Verify the moderator's permissions
- Validate email format
- Handle existing moderator cases
Consider updating the method signature to include validation:
/**
* Assigns a moderator to an exam after validating permissions.
*
* @param examId ID of the exam
* @param moderatorEmail Email of the user to be assigned as moderator
* @throws UnauthorizedException if the current user lacks permission
* @throws InvalidModeratorException if the email is invalid or user lacks moderator role
*/
void assignModerator(Long examId, String moderatorEmail);| GenericResponse updateBrowserLockdown(Long examId, boolean browserLockdown); | ||
| boolean getBrowserLockdownStatus(Long examId); | ||
|
|
||
| GenericResponse updateHostedStatus(Long examId, boolean hosted); | ||
| boolean getHostedStatus(Long examId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for state transitions in exam settings.
The browser lockdown and hosted status updates should validate the exam's current state:
- Prevent changes during active exams
- Ensure proper state transitions
Consider adding validation parameters:
GenericResponse updateBrowserLockdown(
Long examId,
boolean browserLockdown,
boolean force // For administrative override
);
GenericResponse updateHostedStatus(
Long examId,
boolean hosted,
ExamStateValidation validation // Custom validation rules
);
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
New Classes
These updates significantly enhance exam management capabilities, improving user experience and operational efficiency.