jwt api implementation #41
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include several updates to the Changes
β¨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/CookieUtil.java (1)
1-13: Consider adding security-related annotations and documentationWhile the basic structure is good, consider enhancing security by:
- Adding
@Slf4jfor proper security event logging- Adding Javadoc with security considerations
- Consider marking the class as
@ThreadSafeif thread safety is confirmed+import lombok.extern.slf4j.Slf4j; + +/** + * Utility class for managing JWT cookies securely. + * Security considerations: + * - Uses HttpOnly cookies to prevent XSS + * - Uses Secure flag to ensure HTTPS-only transmission + * - Implements cookie-based JWT token management + */ +@Slf4j @Service public class CookieUtil {src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java (2)
62-91: Consider Security Enhancements for Token ValidationWhile the current token validation checks for token validity, user ID, and username, consider adding checks for token expiration and token revocation (e.g., blacklisting tokens upon logout). This will enhance the security of your authentication mechanism.
20-91: Add Unit Tests forJwtAuthenticationUtilAdding unit tests for this utility class will help ensure its reliability and catch potential issues early. Unit tests can cover various scenarios, such as valid tokens, expired tokens, invalid tokens, and exception handling.
Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for this class?
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUtil.java (1)
29-29: Specify character encoding when convertingSECRET_KEYto bytesUsing
SECRET_KEY.getBytes()without specifying a character encoding can lead to platform-dependent behavior. It's best practice to specifyStandardCharsets.UTF_8to ensure consistent encoding across different environments.Apply this diff to specify the character encoding:
-return Keys.hmacShaKeyFor(SECRET_KEY.getBytes()); +return Keys.hmacShaKeyFor(SECRET_KEY.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8));Remember to import
StandardCharsets:import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java (2)
105-110: Ensure proper invalidation of theuserIdcookieWhen clearing the
userIdcookie, it's important to match all the original attributes (such asHttpOnly,Secure, andDomain) to ensure the cookie is properly invalidated in the client's browser.Consider adding these attributes if they were set when the cookie was created:
private void clearUserIdCookie(HttpServletResponse response) { Cookie cookie = new Cookie("userId", null); cookie.setPath("/"); cookie.setMaxAge(0); // Invalidate the cookie + cookie.setHttpOnly(true); + cookie.setSecure(true); // Adjust based on your application's security requirements response.addCookie(cookie); }
54-54: Adhere to standard practices for JWT token handlingIt's recommended to use the
Authorizationheader with theBearerscheme for passing JWT tokens, rather than custom headers or cookies. This aligns with standard conventions and enhances interoperability with clients and tools.Update the code to retrieve the token from the
Authorizationheader:-String jwtTokenFromHeader = request.getHeader("Jwttoken"); +String authorizationHeader = request.getHeader("Authorization"); +String jwtTokenFromHeader = null; +if (authorizationHeader != null && authorizationHeader.startsWith("Bearer ")) { + jwtTokenFromHeader = authorizationHeader.substring(7); +}Similarly, consider avoiding storing JWT tokens in cookies due to security concerns like cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
// Remove methods related to cookies if not necessary -private String getJwtTokenFromCookies(HttpServletRequest request) { ... }Adjust the token retrieval logic accordingly.
Also applies to: 72-72, 97-97
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/data/user/Users.java (1)
33-34: Fix inconsistent column namingThe column name "lastName" uses camelCase while other columns use PascalCase.
Maintain consistent naming:
-@Column(name = "lastName") +@Column(name = "LastName") private String lastName;pom.xml (2)
235-254: Consider using property for version managementThe JWT dependencies share the same version. Consider using a property to manage the version centrally.
Add to properties section:
<properties> + <jjwt.version>0.11.5</jjwt.version> </properties> <dependency> <groupId>io.jsonwebtoken</groupId> <artifactId>jjwt-api</artifactId> - <version>0.11.5</version> + <version>${jjwt.version}</version> </dependency>
235-254: Architecture: JWT Implementation GuidanceSince you're implementing JWT authentication, consider the following security best practices:
- Implement token expiration
- Use secure token storage
- Implement refresh token mechanism
- Add CSRF protection
Would you like me to provide example implementations for these security measures?
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (12)
pom.xml(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_ci.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_dev.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_example.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_test.properties(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/data/user/Users.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/repo/user/UserLoginRepo.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/CookieUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/FilterConfig.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUtil.java(1 hunks)
π Additional comments (6)
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/CookieUtil.java (1)
1-45: Verify consistency with existing security implementations
Let's ensure this implementation aligns with existing security patterns in the codebase and follows best practices.
β Verification successful
Cookie handling implementation follows security best practices
The implementation in CookieUtil.java aligns well with security best practices and is consistent with other JWT-related implementations in the codebase:
- Proper security flags are set (httpOnly and secure) across implementations
- JWT token validation is properly handled in JwtUtil.java
- Cookie cleanup is implemented in JwtUserIdValidationFilter
- Consistent cookie naming and handling patterns across the codebase
- Appropriate error handling for invalid tokens
The implementation demonstrates secure cookie management with:
- HttpOnly flag to prevent XSS
- Secure flag to ensure HTTPS-only transmission
- Appropriate path and expiration settings
- Proper token validation and cleanup mechanisms
π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar cookie handling implementations
echo "Searching for similar cookie handling implementations..."
rg -l "Cookie" --type java
# Search for other JWT token handling
echo "Searching for JWT token handling..."
rg -l "JWT|JwtToken|JsonWebToken" --type java
# Search for security configurations
echo "Searching for security configurations..."
fd "security|WebSecurityConfig" --type java
Length of output: 972
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the JWT and Cookie handling implementations more closely
# Check JwtUserIdValidationFilter implementation
echo "=== JwtUserIdValidationFilter Implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class JwtUserIdValidationFilter {
$$$
}'
# Check JwtAuthenticationUtil implementation
echo "=== JwtAuthenticationUtil Implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class JwtAuthenticationUtil {
$$$
}'
# Check JwtUtil implementation
echo "=== JwtUtil Implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class JwtUtil {
$$$
}'
# Search for security configurations with rg instead
echo "=== Security Configurations ==="
rg -l "SecurityConfig|WebSecurityConfig" --type java
# Look for cookie-related security settings
echo "=== Cookie Security Settings ==="
rg "cookie\.(set|get|add).*secure|cookie.*httpOnly" --type java
Length of output: 718
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to examine the implementations
# Look for cookie and JWT related code with context
echo "=== Cookie Security Implementation Details ==="
rg -A 5 "cookie\.set(Secure|HttpOnly)" --type java
# Check JWT token validation patterns
echo "=== JWT Token Validation Patterns ==="
rg -A 5 "\.getJwtToken|validateToken|extractToken" --type java
# Look for security headers and configurations
echo "=== Security Headers and Cookie Configuration ==="
rg -A 3 "setSecure|setHttpOnly|setMaxAge|setPath" --type java
# Check for cookie-based authentication flows
echo "=== Cookie Authentication Flow ==="
rg -A 5 "addCookie|getCookies" --type java
Length of output: 7217
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java (1)
37-37: Verify the Correct Cookie Name for JWT Token
Ensure that the cookie name "Jwttoken" used in cookieUtil.getCookieValue(request, "Jwttoken") matches the actual cookie name set in your application. Cookie names are case-sensitive, and any mismatch could lead to authentication failures.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the cookie name across the codebase:
β Verification successful
Let me gather more information about JWT token usage in the codebase to ensure we have a complete picture.
Let me check one more thing to see how the cookie is being set in the application.
Cookie Name "Jwttoken" is Consistently Used Across the Codebase
The cookie name "Jwttoken" is consistently used throughout the application, as evidenced by:
- It's used in
JwtAuthenticationUtil.javafor retrieving the token - The same name is referenced in
JwtUserIdValidationFilter.javawhen checking headers - The cookie name is consistently capitalized as "Jwttoken" in all occurrences
π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for usages of cookie names to verify consistency.
# Test: Find all occurrences of cookie names used in getCookieValue. Expect: Consistent naming of 'Jwttoken'.
rg 'getCookieValue\(\s*.*?,\s*"(?P<cookieName>[^"]+)"\s*\)' -or '$cookieName' | sort | uniq -c
Length of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for JWT token cookie name in cookie setting operations
rg -i "setCookie.*jwt|addCookie.*jwt" -A 2
# Search for any JWT-related configuration or constants
rg -i "jwt.*token.*=|jwt.*cookie.*=" -A 1
# Search for cookie-related configuration files
fd -e properties -e yml -e yaml -e xml | xargs rg -i "cookie|jwt" -A 1
Length of output: 2560
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of cookie setting for JWT token
ast-grep --pattern 'addCookie($$$)'
# Also search for any other cookie-related utility methods
rg -i "class.*CookieUtil" -A 5
Length of output: 601
src/main/environment/common_ci.properties (1)
19-19: Reminder: Set a strong JWT secret key before deployment
The jwt.secret property is currently set to a placeholder value. Before deploying to the CI environment, ensure that a strong, random secret key is provided. This key is critical for the security of JWT token generation and validation.
Consider using environment variables or secure configuration management to supply the secret key without hardcoding it in properties files.
src/main/environment/common_dev.properties (1)
17-17: Reminder: Initialize the jwt.secret with a secure key
The jwt.secret property is set to a placeholder. It's important to replace this with a strong, securely generated key specific to your development environment to ensure proper JWT functionality.
Ensure that all developers have access to the appropriate secret key or use a shared configuration management system to manage secrets securely.
src/main/environment/common_test.properties (1)
18-18: Set a secure jwt.secret for testing purposes
The jwt.secret in the test properties file is currently unset. For accurate testing of JWT-related functionality, provide a secure key in this property.
Consider using a distinct secret key for testing to avoid any potential conflicts with other environments and to simulate real-world scenarios.
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/FilterConfig.java (1)
1-19: Verify error handling in the JWT filter implementation
The filter configuration looks good, but we should verify the error handling in the actual filter implementation.
β Verification successful
Error handling in JWT filter implementation is properly implemented
The JWT filter has comprehensive error handling that includes:
- Try-catch block around the token validation logic
- Proper error responses with status codes (401 Unauthorized)
- Detailed error logging using SLF4J
- Specific error messages for different scenarios:
- Missing JWT token
- Invalid JWT token
- General authorization errors
The implementation also includes proper security measures like:
- Skipping validation for public endpoints
- Clearing insecure userId cookies
- Checking both cookie and header-based tokens
π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling in the JWT filter implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class JwtUserIdValidationFilter {
$$$
doFilter($$$) {
try {
$$$
} catch ($$$) {
$$$
}
}
}'
Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first locate the JwtUserIdValidationFilter file
fd JwtUserIdValidationFilter
# Then examine its content to check error handling
rg -A 10 "doFilter.*ServletRequest" --type java
Length of output: 1419
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's get more context of the filter implementation to see the complete error handling
rg -B 5 -A 20 "doFilter.*ServletRequest" src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java
Length of output: 1265
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's get the complete file content to see the full error handling implementation
cat src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java
Length of output: 4378
| public String getJwtTokenFromCookie(HttpServletRequest request) { | ||
| return Arrays.stream(request.getCookies()) | ||
| .filter(cookie -> "Jwttoken".equals(cookie.getName())) | ||
| .map(Cookie::getValue) | ||
| .findFirst() | ||
| .orElse(null); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential NPE and maintain configuration consistency
The method has several issues:
- Potential NPE if
request.getCookies()returns null - Missing input validation
- Inconsistent cookie name configuration
- Missing logging for security audit
- public String getJwtTokenFromCookie(HttpServletRequest request) {
+ public String getJwtTokenFromCookie(HttpServletRequest request) {
+ if (request == null) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Request cannot be null");
+ }
+
+ Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies();
+ if (cookies == null) {
+ log.debug("No cookies found in request");
+ return null;
+ }
+
- return Arrays.stream(request.getCookies())
- .filter(cookie -> "Jwttoken".equals(cookie.getName()))
+ String token = Arrays.stream(cookies)
+ .filter(cookie -> jwtCookieName.equals(cookie.getName()))
.map(Cookie::getValue)
.findFirst()
.orElse(null);
+
+ log.debug("JWT token {} found in cookies", token != null ? "was" : "was not");
+ return token;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not required, working fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@indraniBan Understood, I'll move forward with the current implementation.
| public Optional<String> getCookieValue(HttpServletRequest request, String cookieName) { | ||
| Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies(); | ||
| if (cookies != null) { | ||
| for (Cookie cookie : cookies) { | ||
| if (cookieName.equals(cookie.getName())) { | ||
| return Optional.of(cookie.getValue()); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return Optional.empty(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add input validation and null checks
The method needs defensive programming improvements:
- Missing null check for the
requestparameter - Missing validation for empty/blank
cookieName - Consider logging failed cookie retrievals for security monitoring
- public Optional<String> getCookieValue(HttpServletRequest request, String cookieName) {
+ public Optional<String> getCookieValue(HttpServletRequest request, String cookieName) {
+ if (request == null) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Request cannot be null");
+ }
+ if (cookieName == null || cookieName.trim().isEmpty()) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Cookie name cannot be null or empty");
+ }
+
Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies();
if (cookies != null) {
for (Cookie cookie : cookies) {
if (cookieName.equals(cookie.getName())) {
+ log.debug("Cookie {} found", cookieName);
return Optional.of(cookie.getValue());
}
}
}
+ log.debug("Cookie {} not found", cookieName);
return Optional.empty();
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@indraniBan Understood, I'll retract the suggestion.
(ｑβ’ΜοΈΏβ’Μｑ)
βοΈ Learnings added
Learnt from: indraniBan
PR: PSMRI/Scheduler-API#41
File: src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/CookieUtil.java:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-02-03T14:18:27.807Z
Learning: In the Scheduler-API project's CookieUtil class, extensive input validation and null checks were deemed unnecessary for the getCookieValue method, keeping the implementation simple.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| public void addJwtTokenToCookie(String Jwttoken, HttpServletResponse response) { | ||
| // Create a new cookie with the JWT token | ||
| Cookie cookie = new Cookie("Jwttoken", Jwttoken); | ||
| cookie.setHttpOnly(true); // Prevent JavaScript access for security | ||
| cookie.setSecure(true); // Ensure the cookie is sent only over HTTPS | ||
| cookie.setMaxAge(60 * 60 * 24); // 1 day expiration time | ||
| cookie.setPath("/"); // Make the cookie available for the entire application | ||
| response.addCookie(cookie); // Add the cookie to the response | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance security configuration and add input validation
Several security and configuration improvements are needed:
- JWT token name should be configurable
- Cookie expiration should be configurable
- Missing SameSite attribute
- Missing input validation
- Consider adding domain restriction
+ @Value("${jwt.cookie.name:Jwttoken}")
+ private String jwtCookieName;
+
+ @Value("${jwt.cookie.maxAge:86400}") // 24 hours in seconds
+ private int jwtCookieMaxAge;
+
- public void addJwtTokenToCookie(String Jwttoken, HttpServletResponse response) {
+ public void addJwtTokenToCookie(String jwtToken, HttpServletResponse response) {
+ if (jwtToken == null || jwtToken.trim().isEmpty()) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("JWT token cannot be null or empty");
+ }
+ if (response == null) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Response cannot be null");
+ }
+
// Create a new cookie with the JWT token
- Cookie cookie = new Cookie("Jwttoken", Jwttoken);
+ Cookie cookie = new Cookie(jwtCookieName, jwtToken);
cookie.setHttpOnly(true); // Prevent JavaScript access for security
cookie.setSecure(true); // Ensure the cookie is sent only over HTTPS
- cookie.setMaxAge(60 * 60 * 24); // 1 day expiration time
+ cookie.setMaxAge(jwtCookieMaxAge);
cookie.setPath("/"); // Make the cookie available for the entire application
+ cookie.setAttribute("SameSite", "Strict"); // Prevent CSRF
+ // cookie.setDomain("your-domain.com"); // Restrict to specific domain
+ log.debug("Adding JWT cookie with name: {}", jwtCookieName);
response.addCookie(cookie); // Add the cookie to the response
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED) | ||
| .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - JWT Token is not set!"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
π οΈ Refactor suggestion
Avoid Exposing Internal Error Details in HTTP Responses
Returning detailed error messages to the client can expose internal logic and make your application more vulnerable to attacks. It's better to return generic error messages.
Apply this diff to modify the responses:
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED)
- .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - JWT Token is not set!");
+ .body("Unauthorized access.");
---
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED)
- .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Invalid JWT Token!");
+ .body("Unauthorized access.");
---
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED)
- .body("Error 401: Unauthorized - Username is missing!");
+ .body("Unauthorized access.");Also applies to: 49-50, 55-56
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not required as per requirement
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@indraniBan Understood, I'll respect the requirement to keep the detailed error messages. Moving on from this suggestion.
βοΈ Learnings added
Learnt from: indraniBan
PR: PSMRI/Scheduler-API#41
File: src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-02-03T14:18:58.918Z
Learning: In the Scheduler-API project, detailed error messages in HTTP responses (including specific error conditions) are acceptable as per requirements, particularly in JWT authentication related responses.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); | ||
| throw new IEMRException("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid Logging Sensitive Information
Logging exception messages and stack traces can potentially expose sensitive information. It's important to ensure that logs do not contain sensitive data that could be exploited.
Consider sanitizing log messages and avoid logging full stack traces in production environments.
Apply this diff to modify the logging:
} catch (Exception e) {
- logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e);
+ logger.error("Validation failed during JWT validation: {}", e.getMessage());
throw new IEMRException("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e);
}π Committable suggestion
βΌοΈ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); | |
| throw new IEMRException("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); | |
| logger.error("Validation failed during JWT validation: {}", e.getMessage()); | |
| throw new IEMRException("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); |
| public FilterRegistrationBean<JwtUserIdValidationFilter> jwtUserIdValidationFilter(JwtAuthenticationUtil jwtAuthenticationUtil) { | ||
| FilterRegistrationBean<JwtUserIdValidationFilter> registrationBean = new FilterRegistrationBean<>(); | ||
| registrationBean.setFilter(new JwtUserIdValidationFilter(jwtAuthenticationUtil)); | ||
| registrationBean.addUrlPatterns("/*"); // Apply filter to all API endpoints | ||
| return registrationBean; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
π οΈ Refactor suggestion
Enhance filter configuration with order and exclusion patterns
The current implementation applies the JWT filter to all endpoints without considering:
- Filter execution order
- Public endpoints that shouldn't require JWT (e.g., login, health checks)
- Error handling configuration
Apply this diff to improve the implementation:
@Bean
public FilterRegistrationBean<JwtUserIdValidationFilter> jwtUserIdValidationFilter(JwtAuthenticationUtil jwtAuthenticationUtil) {
FilterRegistrationBean<JwtUserIdValidationFilter> registrationBean = new FilterRegistrationBean<>();
registrationBean.setFilter(new JwtUserIdValidationFilter(jwtAuthenticationUtil));
- registrationBean.addUrlPatterns("/*"); // Apply filter to all API endpoints
+ registrationBean.addUrlPatterns("/api/*"); // Apply only to API endpoints
+ registrationBean.setOrder(1); // Set execution order
+ registrationBean.addInitParameter("excludePatterns", "/api/auth/login,/api/health"); // Exclude public endpoints
return registrationBean;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @Column(name = "AadhaarNo") | ||
| private String aadhaarNo; | ||
| @Expose | ||
| @Column(name = "PAN") | ||
| private String pan; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Review sensitive data exposure
PAN and Aadhaar numbers are sensitive PII (Personally Identifiable Information). They should not be exposed in JSON serialization.
Remove @expose annotations from sensitive fields:
-@Expose
@Column(name = "AadhaarNo")
private String aadhaarNo;
-@Expose
@Column(name = "PAN")
private String pan;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| @Column(name = "UserName") | ||
| private String userName; | ||
| @Expose | ||
| @Column(name = "Password") | ||
| private String password; | ||
| @Expose | ||
| @Column(name = "AgentID") | ||
| private String agentID; | ||
| @Expose | ||
| @Column(name = "AgentPassword") | ||
| private String agentPassword; | ||
| @Expose | ||
| @Column(name = "EmailID") | ||
| private String emailID; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
π οΈ Refactor suggestion
Add field validations
Critical fields like userName, emailID lack validation constraints.
Add appropriate validations:
+import jakarta.validation.constraints.*;
@Column(name = "UserName")
+@NotBlank(message = "Username is required")
+@Size(min = 3, max = 50, message = "Username must be between 3 and 50 characters")
private String userName;
@Column(name = "EmailID")
+@Email(message = "Invalid email format")
+@NotBlank(message = "Email is required")
private String emailID;π Committable suggestion
βΌοΈ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Column(name = "UserName") | |
| private String userName; | |
| @Expose | |
| @Column(name = "Password") | |
| private String password; | |
| @Expose | |
| @Column(name = "AgentID") | |
| private String agentID; | |
| @Expose | |
| @Column(name = "AgentPassword") | |
| private String agentPassword; | |
| @Expose | |
| @Column(name = "EmailID") | |
| private String emailID; | |
| import jakarta.validation.constraints.*; | |
| @Column(name = "UserName") | |
| @NotBlank(message = "Username is required") | |
| @Size(min = 3, max = 50, message = "Username must be between 3 and 50 characters") | |
| private String userName; | |
| @Expose | |
| @Column(name = "Password") | |
| private String password; | |
| @Expose | |
| @Column(name = "AgentID") | |
| private String agentID; | |
| @Expose | |
| @Column(name = "AgentPassword") | |
| private String agentPassword; | |
| @Expose | |
| @Column(name = "EmailID") | |
| @Email(message = "Invalid email format") | |
| @NotBlank(message = "Email is required") | |
| private String emailID; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@indraniBan Understood, I'll move on from the validation suggestion.
βοΈ Learnings added
Learnt from: indraniBan
PR: PSMRI/Scheduler-API#41
File: src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/data/user/Users.java:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-02-03T14:20:56.592Z
Learning: Field validation annotations like @NotBlank and @Email are not required for entity classes in the Scheduler-API codebase as per team's preference.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| @Expose | ||
| @Column(name = "Password") | ||
| private String password; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Implement secure password handling
The password field should not be stored as a plain String. This poses a security risk as String objects are immutable and remain in memory until garbage collection.
Consider this implementation:
-@Expose
-@Column(name = "Password")
-private String password;
+@Column(name = "Password")
+private char[] password;Also, ensure passwords are hashed using a strong algorithm (e.g., BCrypt) before storage.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.jsonwebtoken/jjwt-api --> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>io.jsonwebtoken</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>jjwt-api</artifactId> | ||
| <version>0.11.5</version> | ||
| </dependency> | ||
| <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.jsonwebtoken/jjwt-impl --> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>io.jsonwebtoken</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>jjwt-impl</artifactId> | ||
| <version>0.11.5</version> | ||
| <scope>runtime</scope> | ||
| </dependency> | ||
| <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.jsonwebtoken/jjwt-jackson --> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>io.jsonwebtoken</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>jjwt-jackson</artifactId> | ||
| <version>0.11.5</version> | ||
| <scope>runtime</scope> | ||
| </dependency> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
π‘ Codebase verification
Update JWT dependencies to the latest version 0.12.6
The current version 0.11.5 is outdated. The latest version available on Maven Central is 0.12.6. While no critical security vulnerabilities were found, it's recommended to upgrade to the latest version for potential security fixes and improvements. This affects the following dependencies:
io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-apiio.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-implio.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-jackson
Files that will need testing after the update:
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUtil.javasrc/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java
π Analysis chain
Verify JWT dependency versions
The JWT dependencies are using version 0.11.5. Let's verify if this version has any known vulnerabilities.
Let me verify the latest available version and check for any potential security advisories through Maven Central.
π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for security advisories for JWT dependencies
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: MAVEN, package: "io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 359
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Maven Central for latest version
curl -s "https://search.maven.org/solrsearch/select?q=g:io.jsonwebtoken+AND+a:jjwt-api&rows=1&wt=json" | jq .
# Let's also check if there are any usages of JWT-related code that might need attention
rg -l "io\.jsonwebtoken" --type java
Length of output: 1374
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java (1)
56-58: Ensure consistent string comparison methods for request pathsIn the condition checking the request paths, both
equalsandequalsIgnoreCasemethods are used. This inconsistency might lead to unexpected behavior when matching URLs.Consider using a consistent method for all path comparisons. If case sensitivity is not required, use
equalsIgnoreCasefor all comparisons.-if (path.equals(contextPath + "/user/userAuthenticate") - || path.equalsIgnoreCase(contextPath + "/user/logOutUserFromConcurrentSession") - || path.startsWith(contextPath + "/public")) { +if (path.equalsIgnoreCase(contextPath + "/user/userAuthenticate") + || path.equalsIgnoreCase(contextPath + "/user/logOutUserFromConcurrentSession") + || path.toLowerCase().startsWith((contextPath + "/public").toLowerCase())) {pom.xml (1)
Line range hint
140-145: Avoid using release candidate versions in production codeThe dependencies
jackson-databindandjackson-coreare specified with version2.17.0-rc1, which is a release candidate version. Using release candidates in production environments is not recommended due to potential instability and lack of full testing.Consider updating these dependencies to the latest stable versions.
<!-- For jackson-databind --> -<version>2.17.0-rc1</version> +<version>2.17.0</version> <!-- For jackson-core --> -<version>2.17.0-rc1</version> +<version>2.17.0</version>Also applies to: 147-151
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (6)
pom.xml(4 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/CookieUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/FilterConfig.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUtil.java(1 hunks)
β Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/CookieUtil.java
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/FilterConfig.java
- src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java
- src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUtil.java
π Additional comments (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java (1)
53-54:
Avoid logging JWT tokens to prevent sensitive data exposure
Logging JWT tokens can pose a security risk as it exposes sensitive authentication information. It's important to avoid logging tokens to protect user data and maintain compliance with security best practices.
Consider modifying the log statements to exclude the actual token values:
-logger.info("JWT token from header: " + jwtTokenFromHeader);
+logger.debug("JWT token retrieved from header");
-logger.info("JWT token from cookie: " + jwtTokenFromCookie);
+logger.debug("JWT token retrieved from cookie");Also, adjust the logging level to debug if detailed logs are only necessary during troubleshooting.
Also applies to: 67-68
pom.xml (1)
234-253: JWT dependencies have been correctly added
The new dependencies for JSON Web Token support (jjwt-api, jjwt-impl, jjwt-jackson) are correctly added with the latest stable version 0.12.6. This aligns with best practices for maintaining up-to-date security libraries.
| } | ||
| } catch (Exception e) { | ||
| logger.error("Authorization error: ", e); | ||
| response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED, "Authorization error: " + e.getMessage()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid exposing exception details in error responses
Returning exception messages to the client can reveal sensitive information about the server's internals, which could be exploited by attackers. Instead, return a generic error message.
Consider modifying the error response as follows:
-response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED, "Authorization error: " + e.getMessage());
+response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED, "Authorization error");π Committable suggestion
βΌοΈ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED, "Authorization error: " + e.getMessage()); | |
| response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_UNAUTHORIZED, "Authorization error"); |
|
|
||
| public void addJwtTokenToCookie(String Jwttoken, HttpServletResponse response) { | ||
| // Create a new cookie with the JWT token | ||
| Cookie cookie = new Cookie("Jwttoken", Jwttoken); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
from UI not possible
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
π§Ή Nitpick comments (3)
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/config/RedisConfig.java (1)
18-30: Enhance Redis configuration with connection pool and timeouts.The Redis configuration should include connection pool settings and timeouts for better reliability.
+ @Bean + public RedisConnectionFactory redisConnectionFactory() { + LettuceConnectionFactory factory = new LettuceConnectionFactory(); + factory.setHostName("${spring.redis.host:localhost}"); + factory.setPort(${spring.redis.port:6379}); + factory.setUseSsl(${spring.redis.ssl:false}); + factory.setTimeout(${spring.redis.timeout:2000}); + return factory; + } @Bean public RedisTemplate<String, Users> redisTemplate(RedisConnectionFactory factory) { RedisTemplate<String, Users> template = new RedisTemplate<>(); template.setConnectionFactory(factory); + template.setEnableTransactionSupport(true); // Use StringRedisSerializer for keys (userId) template.setKeySerializer(new StringRedisSerializer()); + template.setHashKeySerializer(new StringRedisSerializer()); // Use Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer for values (Users objects) Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<Users> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(Users.class); template.setValueSerializer(serializer); + template.setHashValueSerializer(serializer); return template; }pom.xml (2)
172-180: New Redis Dependencies AddedTwo new dependencies have been added to support Redis functionality:
spring-boot-starter-data-redisspring-session-data-redisPlease ensure that the corresponding configuration (if any) in your environment or application properties is updated to leverage these dependencies. It may also be worth verifying that any integration tests covering caching or session management are adjusted accordingly.
258-259: Artifact FinalName Version BumpThe
<finalName>property in the<build>section has been updated fromschedulerapi-v1.0toschedulerapi-v3.0.0. This change reflects a significant version bump and should be accompanied by appropriate release notes and documentation updates to inform users of any potential backward incompatibilities.
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
π Files selected for processing (12)
pom.xml(4 hunks)src/main/environment/common_ci.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_dev.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_example.properties(1 hunks)src/main/environment/common_test.properties(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/RoleMasterApplication.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/config/RedisConfig.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/data/user/Users.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/CookieUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUtil.java(1 hunks)
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- src/main/environment/common_dev.properties
- src/main/environment/common_test.properties
- src/main/environment/common_example.properties
- src/main/environment/common_ci.properties
- src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/data/user/Users.java
- src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUserIdValidationFilter.java
- src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtUtil.java
π§° Additional context used
π Learnings (1)
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java (1)
Learnt from: indraniBan
PR: PSMRI/Scheduler-API#41
File: src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-02-03T14:18:59.315Z
Learning: In the Scheduler-API project, detailed error messages in HTTP responses (including specific error conditions) are acceptable as per requirements, particularly in JWT authentication related responses.
β° Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (java-kotlin)
π Additional comments (7)
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/CookieUtil.java (2)
14-24: π οΈ Refactor suggestionAdd input validation to prevent NPEs.
The method needs defensive programming to handle null inputs.
public Optional<String> getCookieValue(HttpServletRequest request, String cookieName) { + if (request == null) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Request cannot be null"); + } + if (cookieName == null || cookieName.trim().isEmpty()) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Cookie name cannot be null or empty"); + } Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies(); if (cookies != null) { for (Cookie cookie : cookies) {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
26-29:β οΈ Potential issueFix potential NPE and use constant for cookie name.
The method may throw NPE if request.getCookies() returns null. Also, the cookie name should be configurable.
+ @Value("${jwt.cookie.name:Jwttoken}") + private String jwtCookieName; + public String getJwtTokenFromCookie(HttpServletRequest request) { + if (request == null) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Request cannot be null"); + } + Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies(); + if (cookies == null) { + return null; + } - return Arrays.stream(request.getCookies()).filter(cookie -> "Jwttoken".equals(cookie.getName())) + return Arrays.stream(cookies).filter(cookie -> jwtCookieName.equals(cookie.getName())) .map(Cookie::getValue).findFirst().orElse(null); }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/main/java/com/iemr/tm/utils/JwtAuthenticationUtil.java (3)
24-37: π οΈ Refactor suggestionUse consistent constructor injection.
The class mixes field injection with constructor injection. Use constructor injection consistently for better testability.
- @Autowired - private CookieUtil cookieUtil; - @Autowired - private JwtUtil jwtUtil; - @Autowired - private RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate; - @Autowired - private UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo; + private final CookieUtil cookieUtil; + private final JwtUtil jwtUtil; + private final RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate; + private final UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo; - public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil) { + @Autowired + public JwtAuthenticationUtil(CookieUtil cookieUtil, JwtUtil jwtUtil, + RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate, UserLoginRepo userLoginRepo) { this.cookieUtil = cookieUtil; this.jwtUtil = jwtUtil; + this.redisTemplate = redisTemplate; + this.userLoginRepo = userLoginRepo; }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
75-85: π οΈ Refactor suggestionAdd validation for userId from claims.
The userId extracted from claims should be validated before use.
String userId = claims.get("userId", String.class); + if (userId == null || userId.trim().isEmpty()) { + throw new IEMRException("User ID is missing in JWT token"); + } + try { + Long.parseLong(userId); + } catch (NumberFormatException e) { + throw new IEMRException("Invalid user ID format in JWT token"); + } // Check if user data is present in Redis Users user = getUserFromCache(userId);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
88-91: π οΈ Refactor suggestionCatch specific exceptions instead of generic Exception.
Catching generic Exception makes it harder to handle specific error cases appropriately.
- } catch (Exception e) { - logger.error("Validation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); - throw new IEMRException("Validation error: " + e.getMessage(), e); + } catch (NumberFormatException e) { + logger.error("Invalid user ID format"); + throw new IEMRException("Invalid user ID format", e); + } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) { + logger.error("Invalid input parameters"); + throw new IEMRException("Invalid input parameters", e); + } catch (RuntimeException e) { + logger.error("Validation failed"); + throw new IEMRException("Validation failed", e); }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
pom.xml (2)
63-67: Formatting Update for Logback DependencyThe
logback-ecs-encoderdependency block has been reformatted for clarity without altering its functionality. The restructuring is consistent with the overall dependency management style in this file.
234-253: Updated JWT Dependencies to Version 0.12.6The JWT-related dependencies (
jjwt-api,jjwt-impl, andjjwt-jackson) have been updated to version0.12.6. This update aligns with the recommendation to upgrade from version0.11.5and should provide improved security and features.
Please verify that all JWT-related implementations (such as filters and utility classes) are fully compatible with this new version.
| @Bean | ||
| public RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate(RedisConnectionFactory factory) { | ||
| RedisTemplate<String, Object> template = new RedisTemplate<>(); | ||
| template.setConnectionFactory(factory); | ||
|
|
||
| // Use StringRedisSerializer for keys (userId) | ||
| template.setKeySerializer(new StringRedisSerializer()); | ||
|
|
||
| // Use Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer for values (Users objects) | ||
| Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<Users> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(Users.class); | ||
| template.setValueSerializer(serializer); | ||
|
|
||
| return template; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate Redis configuration.
This Redis template configuration duplicates the one in RedisConfig.java. Consider removing this configuration and using the one from RedisConfig.java to maintain a single source of truth.
- @Bean
- public RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate(RedisConnectionFactory factory) {
- RedisTemplate<String, Object> template = new RedisTemplate<>();
- template.setConnectionFactory(factory);
-
- // Use StringRedisSerializer for keys (userId)
- template.setKeySerializer(new StringRedisSerializer());
-
- // Use Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer for values (Users objects)
- Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<Users> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(Users.class);
- template.setValueSerializer(serializer);
-
- return template;
- }π Committable suggestion
βΌοΈ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Bean | |
| public RedisTemplate<String, Object> redisTemplate(RedisConnectionFactory factory) { | |
| RedisTemplate<String, Object> template = new RedisTemplate<>(); | |
| template.setConnectionFactory(factory); | |
| // Use StringRedisSerializer for keys (userId) | |
| template.setKeySerializer(new StringRedisSerializer()); | |
| // Use Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer for values (Users objects) | |
| Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<Users> serializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer<>(Users.class); | |
| template.setValueSerializer(serializer); | |
| return template; | |
| } |
| logger.info("User stored in Redis with key: " + redisKey); | ||
| } else { | ||
| logger.warn("User not found for userId: " + userId); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid logging sensitive information.
Logging user IDs and Redis keys could expose sensitive information.
- logger.info("User stored in Redis with key: " + redisKey);
+ logger.info("User data cached successfully");
} else {
- logger.warn("User not found for userId: " + userId);
+ logger.warn("User not found");
}π Committable suggestion
βΌοΈ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| logger.info("User stored in Redis with key: " + redisKey); | |
| } else { | |
| logger.warn("User not found for userId: " + userId); | |
| } | |
| logger.info("User data cached successfully"); | |
| } else { | |
| logger.warn("User not found"); | |
| } |
π Description
JIRA ID:
Please provide a summary of the change and the motivation behind it. Include relevant context and details.
β Type of Change
βΉοΈ Additional Information
Please describe how the changes were tested, and include any relevant screenshots, logs, or other information that provides additional context.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Usersclass for user data management.Bug Fixes
Chores