Skip to content

Conversation

@wdhawkins
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@wdhawkins wdhawkins self-assigned this Feb 9, 2026
@wdhawkins wdhawkins added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 9, 2026
@wdhawkins wdhawkins force-pushed the gmsh_v4_binary_reader branch from b8f2397 to fa1c3dd Compare February 9, 2026 06:28
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

out of curiosity, did you also try to generate the gmsh file as ASCII and see that when read in as ASCII, it gave the exact same answer as the binary. It would be good to have a test that reads in the mesh generated both in ascicc and binary, and check that the difference in the solution is 0.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

out of curiosity, did you also try to generate the gmsh file as ASCII and see that when read in as ASCII, it gave the exact same answer as the binary. It would be good to have a test that reads in the mesh generated both in ascicc and binary, and check that the difference in the solution is 0.

Both the 2D and 3D binary tests are copies of our existing ASCII tests with the meshes saved as binary. They test against the same gold values.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants