Skip to content

Conversation

@jmarrec
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmarrec jmarrec commented Jan 8, 2026

Pull request overview

Minor fix

Pull Request Author

  • Model API Changes / Additions
  • Any new or modified fields have been implemented in the EnergyPlus ForwardTranslator (and ReverseTranslator as appropriate)
  • Model API methods are tested (in src/model/test)
  • EnergyPlus ForwardTranslator Tests (in src/energyplus/Test)
  • If a new object or method, added a test in NREL/OpenStudio-resources: Add Link
  • If needed, added VersionTranslation rules for the objects (src/osversion/VersionTranslator.cpp)
  • Verified that C# bindings built fine on Windows, partial classes used as needed, etc.
  • All new and existing tests passes
  • If methods have been deprecated, update rest of code to use the new methods

Labels:

  • If change to an IDD file, add the label IDDChange
  • If breaking existing API, add the label APIChange
  • If deemed ready, add label Pull Request - Ready for CI so that CI builds your PR

Review Checklist

This will not be exhaustively relevant to every PR.

  • Perform a Code Review on GitHub
  • Code Style, strip trailing whitespace, etc.
  • All related changes have been implemented: model changes, model tests, FT changes, FT tests, VersionTranslation, OS App
  • Labeling is ok
  • If defect, verify by running develop branch and reproducing defect, then running PR and reproducing fix
  • If feature, test running new feature, try creative ways to break it
  • CI status: all green or justified

@jmarrec jmarrec requested a review from anchapin January 8, 2026 12:55
@jmarrec jmarrec self-assigned this Jan 8, 2026

# [chore] Org and copyright year updates for OS 311 [David Goldwasser, 2026-01-05]
7a409fb41f6b0602ef2a6a018c9b3d33934571af
3c5a13b05d17ad83bca6ee84ca130b5c1c7f1dda
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Redo ignoring org rename

#5576 (comment)


double Surface::skylightToProjectedFloorRatio() const {
return getImpl<detail::Surface_Impl>()->skylightToRoofRatio();
return getImpl<detail::Surface_Impl>()->skylightToProjectedFloorRatio();
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bad forward

@anchapin anchapin added the Pull Request - Ready for CI This pull request if finalized and is ready for continuous integration verification prior to merge. label Jan 8, 2026
@DavidGoldwasser DavidGoldwasser added this to the OpenStudio SDK 3.11.0 milestone Jan 8, 2026
@DavidGoldwasser DavidGoldwasser self-requested a review January 8, 2026 18:27
Copy link
Collaborator

@DavidGoldwasser DavidGoldwasser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@ci-commercialbuildings
Copy link
Collaborator

ci-commercialbuildings commented Jan 8, 2026

CI Results for 3e0961d:

@anchapin anchapin merged commit 01cfd89 into develop Jan 9, 2026
5 checks passed
@anchapin anchapin deleted the skylightToProjectedFloorRatio branch January 9, 2026 18:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Pull Request - Ready for CI This pull request if finalized and is ready for continuous integration verification prior to merge.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants