API documentation

[JedS6391]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 91.78% // Head: 91.78% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (222e315) compared to base (d3f4163).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #13   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.78%   91.78%           
=======================================
  Files         153      153           
  Lines        3129     3129           
  Branches      101      101           
=======================================
  Hits         2872     2872           
  Misses        211      211           
  Partials       46       46           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...t/Authentication/Abstract/AuthenticationContext.cs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ET.Client/Authentication/Credential/Credentials.cs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...uthentication/Credential/InteractiveCredentials.cs	91.39% <ø> (ø)
src/Reddit.NET.Client/Command/CommandExecutor.cs	98.92% <ø> (ø)
...rc/Reddit.NET.Client/Models/Internal/Base/Error.cs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ET.Client/Models/Internal/Base/JsonDataResponse.cs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...lient/Models/Public/Read/CommentThreadNavigator.cs	95.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Reddit.NET.Client/RedditClient.cs	94.44% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[JedS6391]

Need to figure out why DocFx is having issues with .NET 5.0. When generating the documentation, MSBuild is encountering the following error:

The "ProcessFrameworkReferences" task failed unexpectedly.

System.MissingMethodException: Method not found: string NuGet.Frameworks.NuGetFramework.get_Platform()

I believe this is due to the MSBuild + Nuget version bundled with mono, which DocFx is running with in my system. The result of this error however is that the generated documentation does not correctly resolve references to BCL types, as below:

The API reference documentation that will ultimately be provided in the README can be viewed here.