-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Add Codacy security scan workflow #9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This workflow integrates Codacy security scans with GitHub Actions, checking code on push and pull requests to the main branch, and scheduling weekly scans. Signed-off-by: Misfit <218383634+JaclynCodes@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@JaclynCodes has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow file is added to perform Codacy security scanning. The workflow triggers on pushes and pull requests to main, plus weekly intervals. It checks out code, executes Codacy analysis, generates a SARIF report, and uploads results to GitHub Code Scanning. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes
Suggested labels
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR adds a new GitHub Actions workflow to integrate Codacy security scans into the CI/CD pipeline. The workflow runs on pushes and pull requests to the main branch, as well as on a weekly schedule.
Key changes:
- Adds automated Codacy security scanning with SARIF output for GitHub Security
- Configures workflow to run on push, pull request, and weekly cron schedule (Sundays at 17:43 UTC)
- Integrates results with GitHub Advanced Security code scanning features
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/codacy.yml (1)
41-55: Configuration looks solid! 🫧 Consider updating to latest action version.The workflow is well-configured with CODACY_ANALYSIS_CLI_VERSION=7.10.0 bundled by default, SARIF output format for GitHub Code Scanning integration, and the appropriate settings for severity adjustment and SARIF generation.
However, the pinned commit SHA (
d840f886c4bd4edc059706d09c6a1586111c540b) appears to be an older version. The latest stable releases are v4.4.7 (17 Jul), v4.4.6 (15 Jul), and v4.4.5 (12 Jul). Consider using a version tag like@v4.4.7instead of a specific commit, which makes future maintenance easier and ensures you're on the latest stable build.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to Reviews > Disable Cache setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/codacy.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔍 Remote MCP
Summary of Relevant Context for PR Review
Codacy Workflow Configuration Best Practices
The PR implementation aligns well with official Codacy GitHub Action recommendations. To authenticate the GitHub Action on Codacy, you should obtain a project API token and store it as an encrypted secret for your repository with the name CODACY_PROJECT_TOKEN, or obtain an account API token and store it as an encrypted secret for your organization with the name CODACY_API_TOKEN. The PR uses project-token from secrets, which is the correct approach for a single-repository setup.
Critical Security Considerations
API Token Security: API tokens grant owner permissions to your projects on Codacy and should never be written to configuration files and kept well protected. This is a key point for the PR review—verify that the project-token secret has been properly configured in the repository settings and is not committed.
Workflow Integration Standards
The workflow triggers on pushes to main, pull requests targeting main, and uses GitHub code scanning integration to display analysis results in the repository's Security tab under Code scanning alerts. The PR's trigger configuration (push to main, pull requests to main, and weekly schedule) follows the recommended pattern.
SARIF Output and GitHub Code Scanning
The analysis results are output to a results.sarif file, which is then uploaded to GitHub. The PR correctly configures this output format and uses github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3 for the upload step. Third-party code scanning tools are initiated with a GitHub Action based on an event in GitHub, and results are formatted as SARIF and uploaded to the GitHub Security Alerts tab.
Key Review Points
- Verify the
CODACY_PROJECT_TOKENsecret is properly configured in repository settings (not checked in code) - Confirm the action version (
codacy/codacy-analysis-cli-actionuses an unversioned reference—consider pinning to a specific version like@masteror a release tag) - The
max-allowed-issues: 2147483647effectively disables issue limits, allowing the workflow to always generate the SARIF report
[::web_search::]
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Security Scan
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/codacy.yml (6)
1-13: Documentation looks great! 🫧The header provides clear context about the third-party action and helpful links to Codacy documentation. This will be handy for future maintainers.
14-24: Trigger configuration is spot-on! 🎯The workflow will run on pushes, pull requests, and weekly intervals—a solid approach for catching security issues early and continuously monitoring the codebase.
25-34: Permissions are configured beautifully! 🔐The least-privilege approach with job-level overrides and clear inline documentation is exactly what we want to see. This keeps the workflow secure while granting only the necessary access.
35-39: Checkout step is solid! ✓Using
ubuntu-latestandactions/checkout@v4are both excellent choices.
47-47: Verify the secret is configured in repository settings! 🔑The workflow references
secrets.CODACY_PROJECT_TOKEN, which must be properly set up in your repository's secrets before this workflow can run successfully. Based on Codacy's documentation, this should be a project API token that grants owner permissions.Please confirm the
CODACY_PROJECT_TOKENsecret has been added to the repository settings (Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions).Based on external tools context: API tokens grant owner permissions and should never be written to configuration files—the use of secrets here is correct.
57-61: SARIF upload step is perfect! 📤The upload configuration correctly references the
results.sariffile generated by Codacy and uses the appropriategithub/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3action. This will integrate beautifully with GitHub's Security tab.
|
Looks like there are a few issues preventing this PR from being merged!
If you'd like me to help, just leave a comment, like Feel free to include any additional details that might help me get this PR into a better state. You can manage your notification settings |
|
copilot/fix-pull-request-merge-issue |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Misfit <218383634+JaclynCodes@users.noreply.github.com>
JaclynCodes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
@JaclynCodes I've opened a new pull request, #10, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Misfit <218383634+JaclynCodes@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
@JaclynCodes @copilot JaclynCodes-patch-1 |
|
@JaclynCodes I've opened a new pull request, #11, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Misfit <218383634+JaclynCodes@users.noreply.github.com>
|
JaclynCodes-patch-1 @copilot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
@JaclynCodes I've opened a new pull request, #12, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
* Add Codacy security scan workflow This workflow integrates Codacy security scans with GitHub Actions, checking code on push and pull requests to the main branch, and scheduling weekly scans. Signed-off-by: Misfit <218383634+JaclynCodes@users.noreply.github.com> * Update .github/workflows/codacy.yml Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Misfit <218383634+JaclynCodes@users.noreply.github.com> * Update .github/workflows/codacy.yml Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Misfit <218383634+JaclynCodes@users.noreply.github.com> * Update .github/workflows/codacy.yml Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Misfit <218383634+JaclynCodes@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Misfit <218383634+JaclynCodes@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This workflow integrates Codacy security scans with GitHub Actions, checking code on push and pull requests to the main branch, and scheduling weekly scans.
Description
Brief description of what this PR does.
Fixes #
Checklist