Add facets to technological attributes #118
Conversation
| - `ISIC_NEW_API_URL` to the absolute URL of the ISIC API root | ||
| - this must include a trailing slash | ||
| - e.g. this value may be `https://api-sandbox.isic-archive.com/api/v2/` for testing | ||
| - e.g. this value may be `https://api.isic-archive.com/api/v2/` for testing |
|
Hello @EkaterinaPoddubskaya and @danlamanna -- when I visit the pre-deploy page on an incognito (no history) window, and then select under "TBP TYPE" : "3D: XP", I see a lot of "Not found" messages pop up on my screen (see screenshot). Can either of you take a look what might be the cause?
|
|
The reason is that we don't have lesion data coming from the server for some of the pictures |
|
Hello @EkaterinaPoddubskaya -- thanks for the quick investigation and reply! Much appreciated :) Since "lesion_id" is not a mandatory field (not all images are associated with a lesion), the UI should not consider that an error (Not Found). Is there a way to make this a "soft fail" (where the user will not see a message)? |
|
Hello @neuroelf ! Yes, implementing a soft fail is possible. I'll be looking into it tomorrow and will update you accordingly. |
|
Hello @danlamanna and @EkaterinaPoddubskaya -- you two probably know github quite a bit better (than I do, I mean)... Given that some files have been changed in both this and another PR, does github automatically refactor this by applying diffs, or is it important in which order I apply the PRs? Or maybe you, @EkaterinaPoddubskaya, have made the changes in the overlapping files (package.json and imagesFilters.js in sources/models) in both PRs? |
|
Otherwise, given this PR has only 4 files changed... Would it make sense to add these changes to the other PR (#121)? |
|
Hello @neuroelf, while the order of PRs might be important, it’s not a major issue since I can resolve any conflicts if they arise. However, I would recommend keeping PRs separate to maintain clear and focused logic. |
|
@EkaterinaPoddubskaya -- OK, I will then merge the PRs in numeric order (unless you suggest a different order). Can you let me know if/when the "soft fail" is (can be) implemented? I would really want to avoid gallery visitors seeing that error message :) |
|
@neuroelf, numeric order should work fine. The "soft fail" is already implemented, but I need some time to test it properly before pushing. My guess is you'll be able to see it in this branch by tomorrow morning :) |
Deploying isic-gallery with
|
| Latest commit: |
97ada7f
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://fc264d71.isic-gallery.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://add-technological-attributes.isic-gallery.pages.dev |
This PR resolves issue #117