Skip to content

Conversation

@anujhydrabadi
Copy link
Contributor

@anujhydrabadi anujhydrabadi commented Jul 9, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Made the "version" property optional for providers in the outputs, allowing greater flexibility when specifying provider details.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Walkthrough

The JSON schema in the CLI's schema file was updated so that the "version" property is no longer required for provider objects within the "outputs" section. Now, only "source" and "attributes" are mandatory for each provider.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
ftf_cli/schema.py Made "version" property optional in the providers JSON schema.

Poem

A tweak in the schema, a hop in my stride,
"Version" now optional, no longer must hide.
Providers feel lighter, with less to declare—
Just "source" and "attributes" needed to share.
A carrot for progress, a schema refined,
Hopping ahead, leaving old rules behind! 🥕


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3465e5 and 9f40bcd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ftf_cli/schema.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
ftf_cli/schema.py (1)
Learnt from: vishnukv-facets
PR: Facets-cloud/module-development-cli#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-26T13:13:07.039Z
Learning: All user-facing properties in spec must have both 'title' and 'description' fields. Properties with 'x-ui-override-disable': true are considered internal and skip this validation, while properties with 'x-ui-overrides-only': true are still user-facing and require validation. This is enforced by the check_properties_have_required_fields() function in ftf_cli/utils.py.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.13)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: lint
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
ftf_cli/schema.py (1)

41-41: Approve optional “version” for providers

Verified that:

  • The schema change only affects the provider object under outputs, making "version" optional.
  • In ftf_cli/commands/register_output_type.py, missing versions fall back to "" via provider_data.get("version", ""), so no runtime errors.
  • There are no tests or docs that assume provider versions are required.

This change is backward-compatible and safe to merge.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@anujhydrabadi anujhydrabadi merged commit 8885f24 into main Jul 9, 2025
6 checks passed
@anujhydrabadi anujhydrabadi deleted the version-provider branch July 9, 2025 11:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants