Skip to content

Conversation

@anujhydrabadi
Copy link
Contributor

@anujhydrabadi anujhydrabadi commented Jul 1, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved validation to only flag conflicts between pattern-based properties and YAML editor settings when the pattern property is of type "object".
  • Tests

    • Added and refined test cases to ensure correct validation behavior for various combinations of pattern property types and YAML editor settings.
    • Updated test names and assertions for clarity and accuracy.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The validation logic in check_conflicting_ui_properties was updated to only flag a conflict between patternProperties and x-ui-yaml-editor: true when any patternProperties entry has a type of "object". The test suite was expanded and refined to cover these nuanced cases, including mixed and non-object types.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
ftf_cli/utils.py Refined conflict detection: only raise error if patternProperties contains an entry with type "object" and x-ui-yaml-editor: true. Updated error message.
tests/test_utils_validation.py Added and renamed tests to cover string, object, and mixed types in patternProperties with x-ui-yaml-editor. Adjusted assertions for new error message.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant check_conflicting_ui_properties

    User->>check_conflicting_ui_properties: Call with spec_obj
    check_conflicting_ui_properties->>check_conflicting_ui_properties: Check for patternProperties
    alt patternProperties present and x-ui-yaml-editor: true
        check_conflicting_ui_properties->>check_conflicting_ui_properties: Iterate over patternProperties
        alt Any type == "object"
            check_conflicting_ui_properties-->>User: Raise UsageError
        else All types != "object"
            check_conflicting_ui_properties-->>User: No error
        end
    else Other conditions
        check_conflicting_ui_properties-->>User: No error or other checks
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sanmesh-kakade

Poem

A rabbit hopped through fields of code,
Where pattern types and flags abode.
If "object" lurked, a warning flew—
But strings? The bunny let them through!
With tests now fresh and logic neat,
This patch is quite the coder's treat.
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
ftf_cli/utils.py (1)

386-401: Implementation correctly validates object-type conflicts while allowing string types.

The refined logic properly iterates through patternProperties and only raises conflicts when any pattern has type: "object" combined with x-ui-yaml-editor: true. This allows string-type patterns to coexist with YAML editor functionality, which aligns with the PR objectives.

However, there's an unused loop variable that should be addressed:

-                for pattern_key, pp_val in pp.items():
+                for _, pp_val in pp.items():
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5019b0f and 0519f16.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • ftf_cli/utils.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_utils_validation.py (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: vishnukv-facets
PR: Facets-cloud/module-development-cli#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-26T13:13:07.039Z
Learning: All user-facing properties in spec must have both 'title' and 'description' fields. Properties with 'x-ui-override-disable': true are considered internal and skip this validation, while properties with 'x-ui-overrides-only': true are still user-facing and require validation. This is enforced by the check_properties_have_required_fields() function in ftf_cli/utils.py.
ftf_cli/utils.py (1)
Learnt from: vishnukv-facets
PR: Facets-cloud/module-development-cli#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-26T13:13:07.039Z
Learning: All user-facing properties in spec must have both 'title' and 'description' fields. Properties with 'x-ui-override-disable': true are considered internal and skip this validation, while properties with 'x-ui-overrides-only': true are still user-facing and require validation. This is enforced by the check_properties_have_required_fields() function in ftf_cli/utils.py.
tests/test_utils_validation.py (1)
Learnt from: vishnukv-facets
PR: Facets-cloud/module-development-cli#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-26T13:13:07.039Z
Learning: All user-facing properties in spec must have both 'title' and 'description' fields. Properties with 'x-ui-override-disable': true are considered internal and skip this validation, while properties with 'x-ui-overrides-only': true are still user-facing and require validation. This is enforced by the check_properties_have_required_fields() function in ftf_cli/utils.py.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/test_utils_validation.py (1)
ftf_cli/utils.py (1)
  • check_conflicting_ui_properties (371-418)
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
ftf_cli/utils.py

393-393: Loop control variable pattern_key not used within loop body

Rename unused pattern_key to _pattern_key

(B007)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
ftf_cli/utils.py (1)

376-378: Documentation accurately reflects the refined validation logic.

The updated docstring correctly specifies that only "patternProperties with object type" conflict with x-ui-yaml-editor: true, reflecting the more nuanced validation behavior.

tests/test_utils_validation.py (6)

66-66: Enhanced test coverage with valid string-type pattern scenario.

The addition of field6 with string-type patternProperties and x-ui-yaml-editor: true appropriately tests the newly allowed combination, ensuring the refined validation logic works correctly.


72-73: Test function renamed to accurately reflect its scope.

The rename from test_pattern_properties_with_yaml_editor_raises() to test_pattern_properties_object_type_with_yaml_editor_raises() clearly indicates that this test specifically validates conflicts with object-type patterns, aligning with the refined validation logic.


84-84: Error message assertion updated to match refined validation.

The assertion now correctly checks for "patternProperties of type 'object'" in the error message, which matches the updated error message from the refined validation logic.


124-135: Comprehensive test for allowed string-type pattern scenario.

This new test case properly validates that patternProperties with string type can coexist with x-ui-yaml-editor: true, covering the core behavioral change introduced by the refined validation logic.


214-231: Thorough testing of mixed-type edge case.

This test case excellently covers the scenario where patternProperties contains both string and object types with x-ui-yaml-editor: true. It correctly validates that the presence of any object-type pattern still triggers the conflict error, ensuring the validation logic works correctly for complex schemas.


233-246: Complete validation of multiple string-type patterns.

This test case ensures that multiple patternProperties entries, all with string type, can coexist with x-ui-yaml-editor: true without triggering validation errors. It provides excellent coverage for multi-pattern scenarios.

@anujhydrabadi anujhydrabadi merged commit c3465e5 into main Jul 1, 2025
6 checks passed
@anujhydrabadi anujhydrabadi deleted the x-ui-yaml branch July 1, 2025 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants