server: Set heartbeat notifications as high prio#151
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @hsjoberg, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the reliability of the server's notification system by elevating the processing priority of heartbeat notifications. By marking these critical messages as high priority, the system ensures that they are handled promptly, which is essential for maintaining consistent communication and monitoring within the application. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the priority of heartbeat notifications from Normal to High. This change ensures that these notifications bypass the standard spacing rules, making the user activity check more reliable. By preventing other notifications from delaying these crucial heartbeats, the system can more accurately detect and deregister inactive users. The change is logical and well-aligned with its intended purpose. I have reviewed the code and have no further suggestions.
No description provided.