-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
Open
Description
Your license is almost identical to MIT license except the next line.
Portions Copyright (c) 2009 The Go Authors (license at http://golang.org) where indicated
I'm not sure if you intentionally modified the license. If not, can you please update the license with more explicit license model name? By doing this, you can have github displayed the name license model in the 'About' section of the front page. This would give users have confidence on it.
The below is what we get from github's license template.
MIT License
Copyright (c) 2014 Philip Hofer
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.
If you intended this, can you please add a little more description/caution in the LICENSE file? Since the rest of the license statements are identical, people can assume it as the MIT license.
Best
0uep, l0nax and Dmaddu
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels