Observed Refraction in Rule Firing

[Karl-Keller]

Hello - I've observed what I believe is refraction in Durable Rules. For instance, once a rule fires against a given fact, no other rules fire. Order of definition matters, for instance I can get those non-firing rules to fire first and exclude the previously fired rule.

First - what is the default strategy in Durable Rules?
Second - if I should be experiencing non-refraction, how do I insure that?

Thanks-

[Karl-Keller]

Workaround - stopped posting initial facts and used assert. This caused any matching rule to fire without refraction. The downside is that results wind up including initial facts and have to be filtered.