fix(fuzz): use 64-bit mask instead of 65-bit in uint/int strategies #12738
+2
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zeroprooff
requested review from
0xrusowsky,
DaniPopes,
grandizzy,
mattsse,
onbjerg and
zerosnacks
as code owners
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
mask64variable was defined as(1 << 65) - 1which produces a 65-bit mask, not 64-bit as intended. The variable name clearly indicates a 64-bit mask was expected.Fixed by changing to
(1u128 << 64) - 1.This doesn't change runtime behavior since
as u64truncates anyway, but now the code matches its intent.