Replies: 5 comments 1 reply
-
|
I can work on this when I'm back in the office on Tuesday, but wondering if we are looking for something like a script that produces the plot below but is flexible such that different regions (even individual gridcells) and simulations can be easily selected in the script. QSNOCPLIQ:long_name = "excess liquid h2o due to snow capping not including correction for land use change", units = "mm H2O/s" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes, I think a script that allows us to evaluate a few different regions
easily would be helpful. And yes, those are the types of fields I think we
would want to see. Can you break precipitation down into rain/snow?
Adding those additional fields would be good. And, albedo.
…On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 4:33 PM Keith Oleson ***@***.***> wrote:
I can work on this when I'm back in the office on Tuesday, but wondering
if we are looking for something like a script that produces the plot below
but is flexible such that different regions (even individual gridcells) and
simulations can be easily selected in the script.
Additional runoff-related variables that may be of interest besides the
ones shown here are:
QSNOCPLIQ:long_name = "excess liquid h2o due to snow capping not including
correction for land use change"
QSNOFRZ:long_name = "column-integrated snow freezing rate"
QSNOMELT:long_name = "snow melt rate"
QSNWCPICE:long_name = "excess solid h2o due to snow capping not including
correction for land use change"
canadian_arctic.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1241bcf6-69c3-4106-a487-9ed742c3353c>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#94 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFABYVGNPLEQ33NAEHDRAQ32XWZL3AVCNFSM6AAAAAB2NKGCP6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTENZRHEZTQMA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I have a script that produces plots similar to above, including rain/snow/albedo and the other fields for various regions. Not sure the best place to share this right now, but here are some sample results: This is comparing 152 (which reverted to CLM5 snow but froze right away) and 140 (which also froze a bit later). Climatologies for years 5-24. Anyway, we can discuss whether these plots are useful and what kind of tweaking they need... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I've expanded the regions a bit as discussed. Slides 3 and 4. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Which presentation again? I clicked on the link previously in the thread
and am seeing the same plots I believe.
…On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 1:10 PM Keith Oleson ***@***.***> wrote:
I've expanded the regions a bit as discussed. Slides 3 and 4.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#94 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFABYVHQE3EHABKIUHUCNLL2YQNKLAVCNFSM6AAAAAB2NKGCP6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTENZWHEYTOMY>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
@dlawren asked if we could (relatively quickly) develop a tool to look at runoff and runoff components regionally and monthly/seasonally. Purpose is to identify problematic behavior that may contribute to the Lab Sea freeze problem.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions