Accessing generated static tags is cumbersome

[glimpsebeyond]

For tag "bando.tag.test" the accessor becomes:

AllGameplayTags.bando.tag.test.Get();

which is a little verbose. What are the downsides to generating source similar to:

public static class Tags
{
    public static readonly GameplayTag bando_tag_test = GameplayTagManager.RequestTag("bando.tag.test");
    public static readonly GameplayTag bando_tag_test2 = GameplayTagManager.RequestTag("bando.tag.test2");
    public static readonly GameplayTag bando_tag_test3 = GameplayTagManager.RequestTag("bando.tag.test3");
}

Which would be Tags.bando_tag_test;?

[felipemcoliveira]

Yeah, the current accessor is a little verbose, but I don't know which naming convention the developer would go with. So if you decide to use snake_case, because it's your preference, it wouldn't work. Since '.' is part of the tag-name syntax, using the same inside the code is always going to work.

But right now, I'm not a huge fan of the generated code. I'm mainly trying to move tags away from the code.